|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #16 out of 26
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #731, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #298 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
| | FG | 3PT | FT | Rebounds | Misc |
| Situation | W-L | G | Min | M | A | Pct | M | A | Pct | M | A | Pct | Off | Def | Tot | Ast | TO | Stl | Blk | DFG% | DF3% | PPG | GmSc |
| Total | 0-1 | 1 | 17:39 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 100.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 42.9 | 37.5 | 10.0 | 14.0 |
| Home | 0-1 | 1 | 17:39 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 100.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 42.9 | 37.5 | 10.0 | 14.0 |
| | | Situation | W-L | G | Min | M | A | Pct | M | A | Pct | M | A | Pct | Off | Def | Tot | Ast | TO | Stl | Blk | DFG% | DF3% | PPG | GmSc |
| Conference | 0-1 | 1 | 17:39 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 100.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 42.9 | 37.5 | 10.0 | 14.0 |
| | | Situation | W-L | G | Min | M | A | Pct | M | A | Pct | M | A | Pct | Off | Def | Tot | Ast | TO | Stl | Blk | DFG% | DF3% | PPG | GmSc |
| | | Situation | W-L | G | Min | M | A | Pct | M | A | Pct | M | A | Pct | Off | Def | Tot | Ast | TO | Stl | Blk | DFG% | DF3% | PPG | GmSc |
| bPG | 0-1 | 1 | 17:39 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 100.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 42.9 | 37.5 | 10.0 | 14.0 |
| | | Situation | W-L | G | Min | M | A | Pct | M | A | Pct | M | A | Pct | Off | Def | Tot | Ast | TO | Stl | Blk | DFG% | DF3% | PPG | GmSc |
| SD | 0-1 | 1 | 17:39 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 100.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 42.9 | 37.5 | 10.0 | 14.0 |
|