|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #64 out of 90
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #633, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #534 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-OTT | 53 | 678:24 | 150/321 | 18/56 | 56/83 | 374 | 46/88/134 | 38 | 13 | 34 | 21 | 98/259 | 15/58 | 58 |
| Avg | | 12:48 | 46.7% | 32.1% | 67.5% | 7.1 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 37.8% | 25.9% | |
| 40-OTT | 53 | 858:12 | 204/499 | 45/124 | 74/107 | 527 | 60/105/165 | 58 | 25 | 36 | 40 | 119/319 | 23/76 | 76 |
| Avg | 5 | 16:12 | 40.9% | 36.3% | 69.2% | 9.9 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 37.3% | 30.3% | |
| 39-OTT | 53 | 655:42 | 116/251 | 21/57 | 48/73 | 301 | 43/87/130 | 50 | 22 | 15 | 16 | 113/269 | 14/55 | 69 |
| Avg | 0 | 12:22 | 46.2% | 36.8% | 65.8% | 5.7 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 42.0% | 25.5% | |
| 38-OTT | 53 | 773:23 | 106/280 | 21/74 | 47/80 | 280 | 55/92/147 | 43 | 25 | 15 | 25 | 118/271 | 10/43 | 78 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:36 | 37.9% | 28.4% | 58.8% | 5.3 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 43.5% | 23.3% | |
| TOTALS | 212 | 2965:41 | 576/1351 | 105/311 | 225/343 | 1482 | 204/372/576 | 189 | 85 | 100 | 102 | 448/1118 | 62/232 | 281 |
| Avg | 5 | 13:59 | 42.6% | 33.8% | 65.6% | 7.0 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 40.1% | 26.7% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 39-OTT | 5 | 64:06 | 13/26 | 1/5 | 11/13 | 38 | 1/2/3 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8/20 | 1/4 | 7 |
| Avg | 0 | 12:49 | 50.0% | 20.0% | 84.6% | 7.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 64:06 | 13/26 | 1/5 | 11/13 | 38 | 1/2/3 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8/20 | 1/4 | 7 |
| Avg | 0 | 12:49 | 50.0% | 20.0% | 84.6% | 7.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
|