|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #46 out of 78
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #685, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #550 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-DET | 14 | 213:17 | 23/62 | 12/25 | 16/19 | 74 | 11/22/33 | 13 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 34/85 | 6/18 | 20 |
| Avg | | 15:14 | 37.1% | 48.0% | 84.2% | 5.3 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42-DET | 2 | 28:55 | 3/8 | 3/6 | 2/2 | 11 | 1/0/1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6/14 | 2/6 | 2 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:28 | 37.5% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 5.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 41-DET | 26 | 421:13 | 45/128 | 21/64 | 38/49 | 149 | 22/34/56 | 93 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 83/185 | 14/40 | 35 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:12 | 35.2% | 32.8% | 77.6% | 5.7 | 2.2 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 44.9% | 35.0% | |
| 40-DET | 53 | 841:03 | 98/273 | 39/123 | 71/84 | 306 | 40/62/102 | 139 | 20 | 12 | 13 | 123/315 | 21/84 | 84 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:52 | 35.9% | 31.7% | 84.5% | 5.8 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 39.0% | 25.0% | |
| 39-DET | 47 | 859:44 | 132/350 | 54/173 | 64/85 | 382 | 34/53/87 | 145 | 25 | 14 | 18 | 138/321 | 16/63 | 62 |
| Avg | 6 | 18:18 | 37.7% | 31.2% | 75.3% | 8.1 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 43.0% | 25.4% | |
| 38-DET | 35 | 730:11 | 121/312 | 37/102 | 57/69 | 336 | 20/51/71 | 133 | 14 | 6 | 35 | 124/267 | 15/53 | 86 |
| Avg | 12 | 20:52 | 38.8% | 36.3% | 82.6% | 9.6 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 46.4% | 28.3% | |
| TOTALS | 177 | 3094:23 | 422/1133 | 166/493 | 248/308 | 1258 | 128/222/350 | 529 | 83 | 52 | 74 | 508/1187 | 74/264 | 289 |
| Avg | 18 | 17:29 | 37.2% | 33.7% | 80.5% | 7.1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 42.8% | 28.0% | |
|