My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #14 out of 90 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #243, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #66 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 1209 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-SA | 53 | 1505:33 | 190/434 | 55/148 | 58/72 | 493 | 57/91/148 | 298 | 37 | 48 | 42 | 294/648 | 69/199 | 132 |
Avg | | 28:24 | 43.8% | 37.2% | 80.6% | 9.3 | 2.8 | 5.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 45.4% | 34.7% | |
40-SA | 53 | 1768:26 | 213/517 | 15/53 | 65/80 | 506 | 66/146/212 | 377 | 61 | 44 | 38 | 328/748 | 90/246 | 147 |
Avg | 48 | 33:22 | 41.2% | 28.3% | 81.3% | 9.5 | 4.0 | 7.1 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 43.9% | 36.6% | |
39-SA | 53 | 1531:36 | 120/281 | 4/20 | 37/42 | 281 | 68/107/175 | 368 | 36 | 14 | 37 | 283/544 | 55/145 | 144 |
Avg | 35 | 28:54 | 42.7% | 20.0% | 88.1% | 5.3 | 3.3 | 6.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 52.0% | 37.9% | |
38-SA | 49 | 872:04 | 64/153 | 2/8 | 32/40 | 162 | 32/66/98 | 217 | 22 | 12 | 21 | 177/339 | 38/92 | 77 |
Avg | 11 | 17:48 | 41.8% | 25.0% | 80.0% | 3.3 | 2.0 | 4.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 52.2% | 41.3% | |
TOTALS | 208 | 5677:39 | 587/1385 | 76/229 | 192/234 | 1442 | 223/410/633 | 1260 | 156 | 118 | 138 | 1082/2279 | 252/682 | 500 |
Avg | 94 | 27:18 | 42.4% | 33.2% | 82.1% | 6.9 | 3.0 | 6.1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 47.5% | 37.0% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
39-SA | 5 | 166:52 | 15/27 | 1/1 | 2/3 | 33 | 7/9/16 | 30 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 34/73 | 8/21 | 12 |
Avg | 5 | 33:22 | 55.6% | 100.0% | 66.7% | 6.6 | 3.2 | 6.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 46.6% | 38.1% | |
TOTALS | 5 | 166:52 | 15/27 | 1/1 | 2/3 | 33 | 7/9/16 | 30 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 34/73 | 8/21 | 12 |
Avg | 5 | 33:22 | 55.6% | 100.0% | 66.7% | 6.6 | 3.2 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 46.6% | 38.1% | |
|