|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #50 out of 90
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #628, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #605 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-SD | 47 | 625:21 | 49/116 | 0/6 | 10/22 | 108 | 65/111/176 | 36 | 18 | 22 | 16 | 84/195 | 18/48 | 37 |
| Avg | | 13:18 | 42.2% | 0.0% | 45.5% | 2.3 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 43.1% | 37.5% | |
| 39-SD | 53 | 937:19 | 173/471 | 11/34 | 42/66 | 399 | 80/148/228 | 39 | 22 | 38 | 29 | 137/294 | 26/67 | 71 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:41 | 36.7% | 32.4% | 63.6% | 7.5 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 46.6% | 38.8% | |
| TOTALS | 100 | 1562:40 | 222/587 | 11/40 | 52/88 | 507 | 145/259/404 | 75 | 40 | 60 | 45 | 221/489 | 44/115 | 108 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:38 | 37.8% | 27.5% | 59.1% | 5.1 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 45.2% | 38.3% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-SCL | 6 | 95:51 | 11/17 | 0/0 | 7/11 | 29 | 9/27/36 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 13/45 | 0/9 | 5 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:59 | 64.7% | | 63.6% | 4.8 | 6.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 28.9% | 0.0% | |
| 40-SCL | 53 | 906:38 | 63/155 | 5/23 | 20/26 | 151 | 98/203/301 | 48 | 30 | 49 | 10 | 113/293 | 18/48 | 52 |
| Avg | 1 | 17:06 | 40.6% | 21.7% | 76.9% | 2.8 | 5.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 38.6% | 37.5% | |
| 38-VAN | 52 | 891:28 | 136/328 | 3/11 | 63/87 | 338 | 47/95/142 | 82 | 38 | 19 | 30 | 169/359 | 24/83 | 81 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:09 | 41.5% | 27.3% | 72.4% | 6.5 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 47.1% | 28.9% | |
| TOTALS | 111 | 1893:57 | 210/500 | 8/34 | 90/124 | 518 | 154/325/479 | 135 | 75 | 77 | 41 | 295/697 | 42/140 | 138 |
| Avg | 1 | 17:04 | 42.0% | 23.5% | 72.6% | 4.7 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 42.3% | 30.0% | |
|