My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #9 out of 90 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #354, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #38 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 1587 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-OTT | 53 | 1945:25 | 436/1152 | 173/554 | 141/185 | 1186 | 88/178/266 | 129 | 70 | 54 | 127 | 358/827 | 64/226 | 161 |
Avg | | 36:42 | 37.8% | 31.2% | 76.2% | 22.4 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 43.3% | 28.3% | |
40-OTT | 48 | 1631:18 | 226/574 | 85/274 | 77/124 | 614 | 63/156/219 | 118 | 63 | 44 | 80 | 299/695 | 61/173 | 171 |
Avg | 48 | 33:59 | 39.4% | 31.0% | 62.1% | 12.8 | 4.6 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 43.0% | 35.3% | |
39-OTT | 53 | 1853:53 | 148/342 | 53/154 | 48/66 | 397 | 81/162/243 | 165 | 60 | 41 | 37 | 367/823 | 55/178 | 179 |
Avg | 53 | 34:59 | 43.3% | 34.4% | 72.7% | 7.5 | 4.6 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 44.6% | 30.9% | |
38-OTT | 50 | 571:52 | 78/204 | 14/54 | 40/62 | 210 | 16/52/68 | 111 | 14 | 2 | 33 | 101/220 | 10/40 | 52 |
Avg | 0 | 11:26 | 38.2% | 25.9% | 64.5% | 4.2 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 45.9% | 25.0% | |
TOTALS | 204 | 6002:28 | 888/2272 | 325/1036 | 306/437 | 2407 | 248/548/796 | 523 | 207 | 141 | 277 | 1125/2565 | 190/617 | 563 |
Avg | 101 | 29:25 | 39.1% | 31.4% | 70.0% | 11.8 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 43.9% | 30.8% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
39-OTT | 5 | 183:42 | 13/34 | 4/12 | 3/4 | 33 | 4/13/17 | 18 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 39/95 | 16/33 | 18 |
Avg | 5 | 36:44 | 38.2% | 33.3% | 75.0% | 6.6 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 41.1% | 48.5% | |
TOTALS | 5 | 183:42 | 13/34 | 4/12 | 3/4 | 33 | 4/13/17 | 18 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 39/95 | 16/33 | 18 |
Avg | 5 | 36:44 | 38.2% | 33.3% | 75.0% | 6.6 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 41.1% | 48.5% | |
|