|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #38 out of 90
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #453, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #325 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-SJU | 53 | 1676:56 | 269/632 | 9/33 | 88/117 | 635 | 108/224/332 | 92 | 34 | 42 | 65 | 276/594 | 41/131 | 138 |
| Avg | | 31:38 | 42.6% | 27.3% | 75.2% | 12.0 | 6.3 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 46.5% | 31.3% | |
| 40-SJU | 53 | 1638:06 | 210/518 | 12/36 | 68/101 | 500 | 103/272/375 | 71 | 37 | 50 | 63 | 211/500 | 34/105 | 146 |
| Avg | 53 | 30:54 | 40.5% | 33.3% | 67.3% | 9.4 | 7.1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 42.2% | 32.4% | |
| 39-SJU | 52 | 1615:34 | 256/628 | 18/48 | 88/132 | 618 | 98/181/279 | 95 | 44 | 50 | 81 | 330/694 | 24/103 | 172 |
| Avg | 52 | 31:04 | 40.8% | 37.5% | 66.7% | 11.9 | 5.4 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 47.6% | 23.3% | |
| 38-SJU | 35 | 666:47 | 77/217 | 3/15 | 50/66 | 207 | 28/103/131 | 38 | 26 | 19 | 28 | 121/250 | 16/51 | 62 |
| Avg | 0 | 19:03 | 35.5% | 20.0% | 75.8% | 5.9 | 3.7 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 48.4% | 31.4% | |
| TOTALS | 193 | 5597:23 | 812/1995 | 42/132 | 294/416 | 1960 | 337/780/1117 | 296 | 141 | 161 | 237 | 938/2038 | 115/390 | 518 |
| Avg | 105 | 29:00 | 40.7% | 31.8% | 70.7% | 10.2 | 5.8 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 46.0% | 29.5% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 38-SJU | 5 | 94:28 | 4/24 | 0/4 | 2/2 | 10 | 6/8/14 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 10/21 | 1/1 | 5 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:54 | 16.7% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 2.0 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 47.6% | 100.0% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 94:28 | 4/24 | 0/4 | 2/2 | 10 | 6/8/14 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 10/21 | 1/1 | 5 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:54 | 16.7% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 2.0 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 47.6% | 100.0% | |
|