
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #71 out of 85 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #325, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #269 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-NOR | 53 | 1024:56 | 227/552 | 33/111 | 99/126 | 586 | 92/147/239 | 45 | 28 | 41 | 39 | 127/320 | 20/64 | 77 |
Avg | | 19:20 | 41.1% | 29.7% | 78.6% | 11.1 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 39.7% | 31.3% | |
41-NOR | 48 | 1388:48 | 305/708 | 43/144 | 78/119 | 731 | 119/252/371 | 61 | 47 | 65 | 58 | 201/494 | 30/94 | 97 |
Avg | 48 | 28:56 | 43.1% | 29.9% | 65.5% | 15.2 | 7.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 40.7% | 31.9% | |
40-NOR | 53 | 1734:55 | 180/488 | 25/114 | 85/112 | 470 | 119/216/335 | 102 | 54 | 66 | 52 | 212/541 | 37/120 | 115 |
Avg | 53 | 32:44 | 36.9% | 21.9% | 75.9% | 8.9 | 6.3 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 39.2% | 30.8% | |
39-NOR | 53 | 1025:00 | 88/196 | 13/37 | 37/52 | 226 | 79/117/196 | 84 | 37 | 36 | 35 | 155/395 | 24/92 | 83 |
Avg | 0 | 19:20 | 44.9% | 35.1% | 71.2% | 4.3 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 39.2% | 26.1% | |
38-NOR | 46 | 984:07 | 62/185 | 13/53 | 51/67 | 188 | 65/104/169 | 90 | 42 | 36 | 24 | 179/406 | 36/92 | 86 |
Avg | 17 | 21:24 | 33.5% | 24.5% | 76.1% | 4.1 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 44.1% | 39.1% | |
TOTALS | 253 | 6157:46 | 862/2129 | 127/459 | 350/476 | 2201 | 474/836/1310 | 382 | 208 | 244 | 208 | 874/2156 | 147/462 | 458 |
Avg | 118 | 24:20 | 40.5% | 27.7% | 73.5% | 8.7 | 5.2 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 40.5% | 31.8% | |
|