My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #72 out of 77 While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #679, his statistical rank is #544. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-MXC | 43 | 1258:13 | 214/469 | 11/36 | 65/83 | 504 | 46/114/160 | 272 | 30 | 15 | 68 | 227/524 | 37/122 | 141 |
Avg | | 29:16 | 45.6% | 30.6% | 78.3% | 11.7 | 3.7 | 6.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 43.3% | 30.3% | |
TOTALS | 43 | 1258:13 | 214/469 | 11/36 | 65/83 | 504 | 46/114/160 | 272 | 30 | 15 | 68 | 227/524 | 37/122 | 141 |
Avg | 0 | 29:16 | 45.6% | 30.6% | 78.3% | 11.7 | 3.7 | 6.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 43.3% | 30.3% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-MXC | 3 | 51:58 | 8/15 | 0/1 | 5/6 | 21 | 5/5/10 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4/7 | 1/1 | 4 |
Avg | | 17:19 | 53.3% | 0.0% | 83.3% | 7.0 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 57.1% | 100.0% | |
TOTALS | 3 | 51:58 | 8/15 | 0/1 | 5/6 | 21 | 5/5/10 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4/7 | 1/1 | 4 |
Avg | 0 | 17:19 | 53.3% | 0.0% | 83.3% | 7.0 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 57.1% | 100.0% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
40-MXC | 16 | 500:26 | 72/190 | 1/4 | 32/43 | 177 | 22/39/61 | 43 | 18 | 12 | 35 | 112/224 | 25/59 | 59 |
Avg | 16 | 31:17 | 37.9% | 25.0% | 74.4% | 11.1 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 50.0% | 42.4% | |
39-SYR | 53 | 991:06 | 140/323 | 4/20 | 53/68 | 337 | 37/91/128 | 68 | 31 | 19 | 52 | 196/403 | 32/94 | 108 |
Avg | 0 | 18:42 | 43.3% | 20.0% | 77.9% | 6.4 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 48.6% | 34.0% | |
TOTALS | 69 | 1491:32 | 212/513 | 5/24 | 85/111 | 514 | 59/130/189 | 111 | 49 | 31 | 87 | 308/627 | 57/153 | 167 |
Avg | 16 | 21:37 | 41.3% | 20.8% | 76.6% | 7.4 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 49.1% | 37.3% | |
|