|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #62 out of 77
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #660, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #153 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-JAX | 15 | 325:56 | 43/135 | 2/16 | 8/12 | 96 | 26/43/69 | 13 | 6 | 15 | 6 | 45/119 | 5/16 | 36 |
| Avg | | 21:44 | 31.9% | 12.5% | 66.7% | 6.4 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 37.8% | 31.3% | |
| 40-JAX | 53 | 1011:12 | 162/407 | 22/76 | 71/104 | 417 | 89/173/262 | 49 | 21 | 43 | 41 | 139/358 | 20/74 | 84 |
| Avg | 0 | 19:05 | 39.8% | 28.9% | 68.3% | 7.9 | 4.9 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 38.8% | 27.0% | |
| 39-JAX | 49 | 839:55 | 136/358 | 17/56 | 66/90 | 355 | 87/153/240 | 33 | 24 | 33 | 37 | 129/298 | 17/38 | 83 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:08 | 38.0% | 30.4% | 73.3% | 7.2 | 4.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 43.3% | 44.7% | |
| TOTALS | 117 | 2177:03 | 341/900 | 41/148 | 145/206 | 868 | 202/369/571 | 95 | 51 | 91 | 84 | 313/775 | 42/128 | 203 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:36 | 37.9% | 27.7% | 70.4% | 7.4 | 4.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 40.4% | 32.8% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 40-JAX | 6 | 121:22 | 9/43 | 1/6 | 8/10 | 27 | 11/21/32 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 15/37 | 3/14 | 10 |
| Avg | 0 | 20:14 | 20.9% | 16.7% | 80.0% | 4.5 | 5.3 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 40.5% | 21.4% | |
| 39-JAX | 5 | 85:53 | 10/39 | 1/6 | 8/10 | 29 | 10/12/22 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 9/26 | 0/0 | 3 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:11 | 25.6% | 16.7% | 80.0% | 5.8 | 4.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 34.6% | | |
| TOTALS | 11 | 207:15 | 19/82 | 2/12 | 16/20 | 56 | 21/33/54 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 24/63 | 3/14 | 13 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:50 | 23.2% | 16.7% | 80.0% | 5.1 | 4.9 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 38.1% | 21.4% | |
|