
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #53 out of 70 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #596, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #423 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-DET | 53 | 802:11 | 117/285 | 27/93 | 51/68 | 312 | 43/128/171 | 32 | 26 | 24 | 22 | 88/229 | 16/50 | 49 |
Avg | | 15:08 | 41.1% | 29.0% | 75.0% | 5.9 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 38.4% | 32.0% | |
41-DET | 53 | 1137:20 | 93/251 | 32/117 | 37/49 | 255 | 73/161/234 | 72 | 29 | 24 | 27 | 184/410 | 28/80 | 96 |
Avg | 19 | 21:28 | 37.1% | 27.4% | 75.5% | 4.8 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 44.9% | 35.0% | |
40-DET | 53 | 803:54 | 48/161 | 15/74 | 24/34 | 135 | 56/94/150 | 48 | 19 | 16 | 10 | 130/278 | 23/54 | 84 |
Avg | 1 | 15:10 | 29.8% | 20.3% | 70.6% | 2.5 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 46.8% | 42.6% | |
39-DET | 44 | 883:27 | 79/240 | 27/102 | 35/56 | 220 | 46/101/147 | 53 | 22 | 20 | 21 | 165/353 | 25/68 | 100 |
Avg | 14 | 20:05 | 32.9% | 26.5% | 62.5% | 5.0 | 3.3 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 46.7% | 36.8% | |
TOTALS | 203 | 3626:52 | 337/937 | 101/386 | 147/207 | 922 | 218/484/702 | 205 | 96 | 84 | 80 | 567/1270 | 92/252 | 329 |
Avg | 34 | 17:52 | 36.0% | 26.2% | 71.0% | 4.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 44.6% | 36.5% | |
|