|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #53 out of 69
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #637, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #444 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-GB | 41 | 975:20 | 153/417 | 29/102 | 65/84 | 400 | 46/102/148 | 78 | 23 | 23 | 53 | 168/420 | 27/108 | 97 |
| Avg | | 23:47 | 36.7% | 28.4% | 77.4% | 9.8 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
| TOTALS | 41 | 975:20 | 153/417 | 29/102 | 65/84 | 400 | 46/102/148 | 78 | 23 | 23 | 53 | 168/420 | 27/108 | 97 |
| Avg | 0 | 23:47 | 36.7% | 28.4% | 77.4% | 9.8 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-GB | 4 | 71:04 | 8/35 | 0/10 | 3/3 | 19 | 1/3/4 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 14/34 | 6/11 | 11 |
| Avg | | 17:46 | 22.9% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 4.8 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 41.2% | 54.5% | |
| TOTALS | 4 | 71:04 | 8/35 | 0/10 | 3/3 | 19 | 1/3/4 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 14/34 | 6/11 | 11 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:46 | 22.9% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 4.8 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 41.2% | 54.5% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 40-GB | 42 | 796:10 | 114/297 | 25/74 | 56/75 | 309 | 32/72/104 | 74 | 22 | 20 | 43 | 117/286 | 26/81 | 89 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:57 | 38.4% | 33.8% | 74.7% | 7.4 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 40.9% | 32.1% | |
| TOTALS | 42 | 796:10 | 114/297 | 25/74 | 56/75 | 309 | 32/72/104 | 74 | 22 | 20 | 43 | 117/286 | 26/81 | 89 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:57 | 38.4% | 33.8% | 74.7% | 7.4 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 40.9% | 32.1% | |
|