|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #63 out of 69
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #729, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #453 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-SYR | 53 | 852:42 | 113/296 | 10/24 | 45/59 | 281 | 68/154/222 | 38 | 22 | 31 | 17 | 115/269 | 25/59 | 81 |
| Avg | | 16:05 | 38.2% | 41.7% | 76.3% | 5.3 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 42.8% | 42.4% | |
| TOTALS | 53 | 852:42 | 113/296 | 10/24 | 45/59 | 281 | 68/154/222 | 38 | 22 | 31 | 17 | 115/269 | 25/59 | 81 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:05 | 38.2% | 41.7% | 76.3% | 5.3 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 42.8% | 42.4% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-SYR | 6 | 87:47 | 19/31 | 0/3 | 3/3 | 41 | 4/17/21 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14/40 | 1/2 | 10 |
| Avg | | 14:38 | 61.3% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 6.8 | 3.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 35.0% | 50.0% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 87:47 | 19/31 | 0/3 | 3/3 | 41 | 4/17/21 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14/40 | 1/2 | 10 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:38 | 61.3% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 6.8 | 3.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 35.0% | 50.0% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 40-SYR | 12 | 380:27 | 30/108 | 3/14 | 16/22 | 79 | 21/50/71 | 30 | 6 | 13 | 14 | 61/143 | 9/37 | 33 |
| Avg | 12 | 31:42 | 27.8% | 21.4% | 72.7% | 6.6 | 5.9 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 42.7% | 24.3% | |
| TOTALS | 12 | 380:27 | 30/108 | 3/14 | 16/22 | 79 | 21/50/71 | 30 | 6 | 13 | 14 | 61/143 | 9/37 | 33 |
| Avg | 12 | 31:42 | 27.8% | 21.4% | 72.7% | 6.6 | 5.9 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 42.7% | 24.3% | |
|