
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #36 out of 59 While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #740, his statistical rank is #390. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
43-SOD | 42 | 819:09 | 179/352 | 40/104 | 59/78 | 457 | 52/102/154 | 65 | 35 | 21 | 82 | 138/299 | 23/74 | 94 |
Avg | | 19:30 | 50.9% | 38.5% | 75.6% | 10.9 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 46.2% | 31.1% | |
TOTALS | 42 | 819:09 | 179/352 | 40/104 | 59/78 | 457 | 52/102/154 | 65 | 35 | 21 | 82 | 138/299 | 23/74 | 94 |
Avg | 0 | 19:30 | 50.9% | 38.5% | 75.6% | 10.9 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 46.2% | 31.1% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
43-SOD | 6 | 124:57 | 25/59 | 8/20 | 7/8 | 65 | 10/20/30 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 36/64 | 11/21 | 12 |
Avg | | 20:50 | 42.4% | 40.0% | 87.5% | 10.8 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 56.3% | 52.4% | |
TOTALS | 6 | 124:57 | 25/59 | 8/20 | 7/8 | 65 | 10/20/30 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 36/64 | 11/21 | 12 |
Avg | 0 | 20:50 | 42.4% | 40.0% | 87.5% | 10.8 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 56.3% | 52.4% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-SOD | 24 | 346:47 | 38/89 | 4/13 | 12/17 | 92 | 26/38/64 | 19 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 48/110 | 6/19 | 47 |
Avg | 0 | 14:27 | 42.7% | 30.8% | 70.6% | 3.8 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 43.6% | 31.6% | |
41-SOD | 19 | 255:48 | 21/38 | 3/4 | 8/12 | 53 | 15/30/45 | 26 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 39/86 | 9/23 | 28 |
Avg | 0 | 13:28 | 55.3% | 75.0% | 66.7% | 2.8 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 45.3% | 39.1% | |
TOTALS | 43 | 602:35 | 59/127 | 7/17 | 20/29 | 145 | 41/68/109 | 45 | 13 | 18 | 26 | 87/196 | 15/42 | 75 |
Avg | 0 | 14:01 | 46.5% | 41.2% | 69.0% | 3.4 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 44.4% | 35.7% | |
|