
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #2 out of 59 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #156, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #16 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 1884 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
43-SD | 26 | 883:02 | 90/176 | 9/23 | 26/34 | 215 | 48/88/136 | 74 | 40 | 41 | 27 | 148/360 | 26/82 | 71 |
Avg | | 33:58 | 51.1% | 39.1% | 76.5% | 8.3 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 41.1% | 31.7% | |
42-SD | 17 | 590:18 | 79/162 | 10/31 | 15/25 | 183 | 34/68/102 | 43 | 23 | 26 | 36 | 99/223 | 23/66 | 34 |
Avg | 17 | 34:43 | 48.8% | 32.3% | 60.0% | 10.8 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 44.4% | 34.8% | |
41-SD | 5 | 66:23 | 8/16 | 0/3 | 1/4 | 17 | 3/7/10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 12/27 | 4/7 | 5 |
Avg | 0 | 13:17 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 25.0% | 3.4 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 44.4% | 57.1% | |
TOTALS | 48 | 1539:43 | 177/354 | 19/57 | 42/63 | 415 | 85/163/248 | 120 | 66 | 71 | 68 | 259/610 | 53/155 | 110 |
Avg | 17 | 32:05 | 50.0% | 33.3% | 66.7% | 8.6 | 5.2 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 42.5% | 34.2% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-SCL | 22 | 769:44 | 198/429 | 18/67 | 68/79 | 482 | 69/94/163 | 49 | 26 | 52 | 75 | 120/321 | 17/69 | 44 |
Avg | 22 | 34:59 | 46.2% | 26.9% | 86.1% | 21.9 | 7.4 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 37.4% | 24.6% | |
41-SCL | 48 | 1670:11 | 271/670 | 25/93 | 79/103 | 646 | 130/236/366 | 94 | 57 | 91 | 113 | 272/668 | 48/158 | 122 |
Avg | 48 | 34:48 | 40.4% | 26.9% | 76.7% | 13.5 | 7.6 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 40.7% | 30.4% | |
TOTALS | 70 | 2439:55 | 469/1099 | 43/160 | 147/182 | 1128 | 199/330/529 | 143 | 83 | 143 | 188 | 392/989 | 65/227 | 166 |
Avg | 70 | 34:51 | 42.7% | 26.9% | 80.8% | 16.1 | 7.6 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 39.6% | 28.6% | |
|