
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #6 out of 62 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #617, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #91 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 871 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-HAR | 53 | 747:22 | 148/324 | 16/50 | 79/100 | 391 | 17/58/75 | 139 | 14 | 17 | 36 | 125/307 | 39/103 | 79 |
Avg | | 14:06 | 45.7% | 32.0% | 79.0% | 7.4 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 40.7% | 37.9% | |
TOTALS | 53 | 747:22 | 148/324 | 16/50 | 79/100 | 391 | 17/58/75 | 139 | 14 | 17 | 36 | 125/307 | 39/103 | 79 |
Avg | 0 | 14:06 | 45.7% | 32.0% | 79.0% | 7.4 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 40.7% | 37.9% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-HAR | 17 | 232:06 | 40/87 | 3/9 | 31/38 | 114 | 4/24/28 | 44 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 34/89 | 13/28 | 23 |
Avg | | 13:39 | 46.0% | 33.3% | 81.6% | 6.7 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 38.2% | 46.4% | |
41-HAR | 1 | 13:56 | 3/7 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 7 | 0/2/2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5/7 | 1/2 | 1 |
Avg | | 13:56 | 42.9% | 100.0% | | 7.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
TOTALS | 18 | 246:02 | 43/94 | 4/10 | 31/38 | 121 | 4/26/30 | 47 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 39/96 | 14/30 | 24 |
Avg | 0 | 13:40 | 45.7% | 40.0% | 81.6% | 6.7 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 40.6% | 46.7% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-HAR | 53 | 729:10 | 100/226 | 7/45 | 43/53 | 250 | 21/57/78 | 119 | 21 | 17 | 29 | 122/278 | 27/62 | 78 |
Avg | 0 | 13:45 | 44.2% | 15.6% | 81.1% | 4.7 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 43.9% | 43.5% | |
TOTALS | 53 | 729:10 | 100/226 | 7/45 | 43/53 | 250 | 21/57/78 | 119 | 21 | 17 | 29 | 122/278 | 27/62 | 78 |
Avg | 0 | 13:45 | 44.2% | 15.6% | 81.1% | 4.7 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 43.9% | 43.5% | |
|