
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #54 out of 62 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #625, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #511 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-HAR | 53 | 744:24 | 133/312 | 20/57 | 63/77 | 349 | 43/70/113 | 58 | 23 | 7 | 49 | 118/255 | 21/60 | 74 |
Avg | | 14:03 | 42.6% | 35.1% | 81.8% | 6.6 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 46.3% | 35.0% | |
TOTALS | 53 | 744:24 | 133/312 | 20/57 | 63/77 | 349 | 43/70/113 | 58 | 23 | 7 | 49 | 118/255 | 21/60 | 74 |
Avg | 0 | 14:03 | 42.6% | 35.1% | 81.8% | 6.6 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 46.3% | 35.0% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-HAR | 17 | 215:59 | 45/88 | 2/10 | 23/26 | 115 | 9/16/25 | 19 | 11 | 6 | 15 | 44/92 | 10/26 | 17 |
Avg | | 12:42 | 51.1% | 20.0% | 88.5% | 6.8 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 47.8% | 38.5% | |
41-HAR | 1 | 12:18 | 2/3 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 5 | 1/0/1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0 |
Avg | | 12:18 | 66.7% | 50.0% | | 5.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | | |
TOTALS | 18 | 228:17 | 47/91 | 3/12 | 23/26 | 120 | 10/16/26 | 21 | 13 | 6 | 15 | 44/94 | 10/26 | 17 |
Avg | 0 | 12:41 | 51.6% | 25.0% | 88.5% | 6.7 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 46.8% | 38.5% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-HAR | 53 | 742:46 | 79/184 | 2/27 | 36/48 | 196 | 36/85/121 | 72 | 22 | 13 | 33 | 127/303 | 27/96 | 94 |
Avg | 0 | 14:01 | 42.9% | 7.4% | 75.0% | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 41.9% | 28.1% | |
TOTALS | 53 | 742:46 | 79/184 | 2/27 | 36/48 | 196 | 36/85/121 | 72 | 22 | 13 | 33 | 127/303 | 27/96 | 94 |
Avg | 0 | 14:01 | 42.9% | 7.4% | 75.0% | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 41.9% | 28.1% | |
|