|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #58 out of 62
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #774, his statistical rank is #652.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 42-JAX | 53 | 999:07 | 55/153 | 8/35 | 30/43 | 148 | 105/194/299 | 54 | 32 | 42 | 38 | 134/287 | 13/44 | 79 |
| Avg | | 18:51 | 35.9% | 22.9% | 69.8% | 2.8 | 5.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 46.7% | 29.5% | |
| TOTALS | 53 | 999:07 | 55/153 | 8/35 | 30/43 | 148 | 105/194/299 | 54 | 32 | 42 | 38 | 134/287 | 13/44 | 79 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:51 | 35.9% | 22.9% | 69.8% | 2.8 | 5.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 46.7% | 29.5% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 42-JAX | 5 | 90:45 | 9/21 | 0/2 | 2/4 | 20 | 9/15/24 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 10/32 | 2/4 | 8 |
| Avg | | 18:09 | 42.9% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 4.0 | 4.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 31.3% | 50.0% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 90:45 | 9/21 | 0/2 | 2/4 | 20 | 9/15/24 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 10/32 | 2/4 | 8 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:09 | 42.9% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 4.0 | 4.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 31.3% | 50.0% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-JAX | 53 | 1083:16 | 138/403 | 13/63 | 67/91 | 356 | 108/217/325 | 46 | 16 | 41 | 81 | 116/261 | 15/35 | 73 |
| Avg | 3 | 20:26 | 34.2% | 20.6% | 73.6% | 6.7 | 6.1 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 44.4% | 42.9% | |
| TOTALS | 53 | 1083:16 | 138/403 | 13/63 | 67/91 | 356 | 108/217/325 | 46 | 16 | 41 | 81 | 116/261 | 15/35 | 73 |
| Avg | 3 | 20:26 | 34.2% | 20.6% | 73.6% | 6.7 | 6.1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 44.4% | 42.9% | |
|