|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #35 out of 76
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #263, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #230 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 525 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-SAO | 31 | 1001:15 | 179/383 | 21/63 | 72/87 | 451 | 61/117/178 | 62 | 31 | 33 | 63 | 174/403 | 32/82 | 84 |
| Avg | | 32:18 | 46.7% | 33.3% | 82.8% | 14.5 | 5.7 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 43.2% | 39.0% | |
| 43-SAO | 50 | 1441:05 | 229/535 | 21/75 | 76/103 | 555 | 61/168/229 | 107 | 44 | 46 | 102 | 217/521 | 36/111 | 126 |
| Avg | 50 | 28:49 | 42.8% | 28.0% | 73.8% | 11.1 | 4.6 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 41.7% | 32.4% | |
| 42-SAO | 15 | 201:25 | 28/68 | 4/8 | 10/20 | 70 | 10/22/32 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 30/70 | 9/15 | 14 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:26 | 41.2% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 4.7 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 42.9% | 60.0% | |
| TOTALS | 96 | 2643:45 | 436/986 | 46/146 | 158/210 | 1076 | 132/307/439 | 179 | 78 | 86 | 182 | 421/994 | 77/208 | 224 |
| Avg | 50 | 27:32 | 44.2% | 31.5% | 75.2% | 11.2 | 4.6 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 42.4% | 37.0% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-SAO | 12 | 360:29 | 46/117 | 7/21 | 9/20 | 108 | 21/46/67 | 18 | 20 | 9 | 24 | 74/154 | 13/36 | 29 |
| Avg | 12 | 30:02 | 39.3% | 33.3% | 45.0% | 9.0 | 5.6 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 48.1% | 36.1% | |
| 42-SAO | 8 | 75:51 | 12/22 | 1/2 | 5/6 | 30 | 0/9/9 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 16/32 | 7/13 | 10 |
| Avg | 0 | 9:29 | 54.5% | 50.0% | 83.3% | 3.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 50.0% | 53.8% | |
| TOTALS | 20 | 436:20 | 58/139 | 8/23 | 14/26 | 138 | 21/55/76 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 32 | 90/186 | 20/49 | 39 |
| Avg | 12 | 21:49 | 41.7% | 34.8% | 53.8% | 6.9 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 48.4% | 40.8% | |
|