|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #50 out of 73
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #641, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #556 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-SCL | 46 | 511:51 | 77/184 | 21/69 | 41/63 | 216 | 52/107/159 | 20 | 12 | 35 | 31 | 69/173 | 10/23 | 34 |
| Avg | | 11:08 | 41.8% | 30.4% | 65.1% | 4.7 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 39.9% | 43.5% | |
| 43-CAL | 15 | 269:29 | 17/51 | 2/10 | 16/22 | 52 | 18/67/85 | 10 | 5 | 24 | 14 | 47/110 | 14/27 | 21 |
| Avg | 3 | 17:58 | 33.3% | 20.0% | 72.7% | 3.5 | 5.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 42.7% | 51.9% | |
| 43-TAM | 26 | 290:00 | 42/117 | 15/49 | 9/18 | 108 | 27/54/81 | 12 | 5 | 18 | 19 | 40/92 | 6/25 | 21 |
| Avg | 0 | 11:09 | 35.9% | 30.6% | 50.0% | 4.2 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 43.5% | 24.0% | |
| 42-CAL | 27 | 674:20 | 64/173 | 6/27 | 31/40 | 165 | 46/130/176 | 34 | 13 | 28 | 38 | 95/228 | 12/37 | 52 |
| Avg | 15 | 24:59 | 37.0% | 22.2% | 77.5% | 6.1 | 6.5 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 41.7% | 32.4% | |
| TOTALS | 114 | 1745:40 | 200/525 | 44/155 | 97/143 | 541 | 143/358/501 | 76 | 35 | 105 | 102 | 251/603 | 42/112 | 128 |
| Avg | 18 | 15:19 | 38.1% | 28.4% | 67.8% | 4.7 | 4.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 41.6% | 37.5% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-TAM | 7 | 73:01 | 7/26 | 1/10 | 1/2 | 16 | 5/18/23 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0/7 | 0/3 | 4 |
| Avg | 0 | 10:26 | 26.9% | 10.0% | 50.0% | 2.3 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| TOTALS | 7 | 73:01 | 7/26 | 1/10 | 1/2 | 16 | 5/18/23 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0/7 | 0/3 | 4 |
| Avg | 0 | 10:26 | 26.9% | 10.0% | 50.0% | 2.3 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
|