|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #59 out of 73
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #580, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #452 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-SFE | 53 | 985:11 | 167/428 | 46/163 | 71/84 | 451 | 53/87/140 | 68 | 49 | 24 | 35 | 181/443 | 50/118 | 92 |
| Avg | | 18:35 | 39.0% | 28.2% | 84.5% | 8.5 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 40.9% | 42.4% | |
| 44-SFE | 53 | 1315:13 | 98/247 | 30/87 | 29/37 | 255 | 48/82/130 | 303 | 37 | 17 | 19 | 236/495 | 38/113 | 144 |
| Avg | 27 | 24:49 | 39.7% | 34.5% | 78.4% | 4.8 | 2.5 | 5.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 47.7% | 33.6% | |
| 43-SFE | 53 | 1614:48 | 108/299 | 34/111 | 36/51 | 286 | 57/150/207 | 381 | 41 | 16 | 35 | 303/661 | 58/183 | 164 |
| Avg | 53 | 30:28 | 36.1% | 30.6% | 70.6% | 5.4 | 3.9 | 7.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 45.8% | 31.7% | |
| 42-SFE | 53 | 890:37 | 48/144 | 12/42 | 31/45 | 139 | 31/68/99 | 202 | 26 | 5 | 18 | 156/343 | 34/94 | 94 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:48 | 33.3% | 28.6% | 68.9% | 2.6 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 45.5% | 36.2% | |
| TOTALS | 212 | 4805:49 | 421/1118 | 122/403 | 167/217 | 1131 | 189/387/576 | 954 | 153 | 62 | 107 | 876/1942 | 180/508 | 494 |
| Avg | 80 | 22:40 | 37.7% | 30.3% | 77.0% | 5.3 | 2.7 | 4.5 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 45.1% | 35.4% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-SFE | 5 | 151:10 | 13/25 | 5/12 | 2/2 | 33 | 3/3/6 | 36 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 32/80 | 5/15 | 11 |
| Avg | 5 | 30:14 | 52.0% | 41.7% | 100.0% | 6.6 | 1.2 | 7.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 151:10 | 13/25 | 5/12 | 2/2 | 33 | 3/3/6 | 36 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 32/80 | 5/15 | 11 |
| Avg | 5 | 30:14 | 52.0% | 41.7% | 100.0% | 6.6 | 1.2 | 7.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
|