|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #11 out of 88
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #267, his statistical rank is #234.
Therefore we believe a salary of 810 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-PHI | 24 | 322:14 | 13/43 | 0/4 | 8/8 | 34 | 17/48/65 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 17 | 57/112 | 19/36 | 25 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:26 | 30.2% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 1.4 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 50.9% | 52.8% | |
| TOTALS | 24 | 322:14 | 13/43 | 0/4 | 8/8 | 34 | 17/48/65 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 17 | 57/112 | 19/36 | 25 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:26 | 30.2% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 1.4 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 50.9% | 52.8% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-SOD | 31 | 1013:53 | 151/337 | 21/58 | 35/44 | 358 | 110/221/331 | 34 | 34 | 43 | 58 | 162/326 | 10/42 | 52 |
| Avg | 0 | 32:42 | 44.8% | 36.2% | 79.5% | 11.5 | 10.7 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 49.7% | 23.8% | |
| 43-SOD | 26 | 744:13 | 89/196 | 5/25 | 45/50 | 228 | 46/115/161 | 50 | 29 | 52 | 31 | 137/318 | 21/72 | 57 |
| Avg | 22 | 28:37 | 45.4% | 20.0% | 90.0% | 8.8 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 43.1% | 29.2% | |
| TOTALS | 57 | 1758:06 | 240/533 | 26/83 | 80/94 | 586 | 156/336/492 | 84 | 63 | 95 | 89 | 299/644 | 31/114 | 109 |
| Avg | 22 | 30:51 | 45.0% | 31.3% | 85.1% | 10.3 | 8.6 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 46.4% | 27.2% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-SOD | 6 | 80:44 | 6/17 | 1/4 | 4/4 | 17 | 9/12/21 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 12/28 | 4/11 | 11 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:27 | 35.3% | 25.0% | 100.0% | 2.8 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 42.9% | 36.4% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 80:44 | 6/17 | 1/4 | 4/4 | 17 | 9/12/21 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 12/28 | 4/11 | 11 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:27 | 35.3% | 25.0% | 100.0% | 2.8 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 42.9% | 36.4% | |
|