|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #10 out of 81
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #238, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #121 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 825 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-RIO | 48 | 1569:18 | 303/587 | 31/89 | 87/109 | 724 | 69/141/210 | 140 | 46 | 37 | 51 | 335/686 | 57/160 | 135 |
| Avg | | 32:42 | 51.6% | 34.8% | 79.8% | 15.1 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 48.8% | 35.6% | |
| 44-RIO | 53 | 787:32 | 127/309 | 14/52 | 68/77 | 336 | 40/62/102 | 58 | 30 | 20 | 51 | 131/308 | 30/86 | 84 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:52 | 41.1% | 26.9% | 88.3% | 6.3 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 42.5% | 34.9% | |
| 43-RIO | 53 | 1078:28 | 214/469 | 24/78 | 90/114 | 542 | 57/104/161 | 94 | 42 | 23 | 86 | 214/489 | 37/103 | 112 |
| Avg | 11 | 20:21 | 45.6% | 30.8% | 78.9% | 10.2 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 43.8% | 35.9% | |
| TOTALS | 154 | 3435:18 | 644/1365 | 69/219 | 245/300 | 1602 | 166/307/473 | 292 | 118 | 80 | 188 | 680/1483 | 124/349 | 331 |
| Avg | 11 | 22:18 | 47.2% | 31.5% | 81.7% | 10.4 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 45.9% | 35.5% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-RIO | 11 | 161:09 | 36/73 | 4/10 | 15/19 | 91 | 5/14/19 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 39/93 | 13/33 | 16 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:39 | 49.3% | 40.0% | 78.9% | 8.3 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 41.9% | 39.4% | |
| 43-RIO | 4 | 57:14 | 13/30 | 1/4 | 4/4 | 31 | 5/4/9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8/15 | 2/4 | 5 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:19 | 43.3% | 25.0% | 100.0% | 7.8 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 53.3% | 50.0% | |
| TOTALS | 15 | 218:23 | 49/103 | 5/14 | 19/23 | 122 | 10/18/28 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 47/108 | 15/37 | 21 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:34 | 47.6% | 35.7% | 82.6% | 8.1 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 43.5% | 40.5% | |
|