|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #65 out of 88
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #328, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #269 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-PIT | 53 | 1458:27 | 234/533 | 11/39 | 65/87 | 544 | 65/121/186 | 345 | 33 | 20 | 96 | 277/564 | 54/126 | 148 |
| Avg | | 27:31 | 43.9% | 28.2% | 74.7% | 10.3 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 49.1% | 42.9% | |
| TOTALS | 53 | 1458:27 | 234/533 | 11/39 | 65/87 | 544 | 65/121/186 | 345 | 33 | 20 | 96 | 277/564 | 54/126 | 148 |
| Avg | 0 | 27:31 | 43.9% | 28.2% | 74.7% | 10.3 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 49.1% | 42.9% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-PIT | 5 | 145:56 | 19/49 | 1/6 | 9/11 | 48 | 4/15/19 | 37 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 45/77 | 7/20 | 22 |
| Avg | | 29:11 | 38.8% | 16.7% | 81.8% | 9.6 | 3.8 | 7.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 58.4% | 35.0% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 145:56 | 19/49 | 1/6 | 9/11 | 48 | 4/15/19 | 37 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 45/77 | 7/20 | 22 |
| Avg | 0 | 29:11 | 38.8% | 16.7% | 81.8% | 9.6 | 3.8 | 7.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 58.4% | 35.0% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-PIT | 42 | 1098:27 | 158/368 | 19/70 | 44/64 | 379 | 39/101/140 | 166 | 38 | 14 | 82 | 249/524 | 49/122 | 136 |
| Avg | 34 | 26:09 | 42.9% | 27.1% | 68.8% | 9.0 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 47.5% | 40.2% | |
| TOTALS | 42 | 1098:27 | 158/368 | 19/70 | 44/64 | 379 | 39/101/140 | 166 | 38 | 14 | 82 | 249/524 | 49/122 | 136 |
| Avg | 34 | 26:09 | 42.9% | 27.1% | 68.8% | 9.0 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 47.5% | 40.2% | |
|