|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #44 out of 76
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #249, his statistical rank is #158.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 46-PIT | 30 | 914:46 | 181/347 | 6/20 | 39/51 | 407 | 31/77/108 | 220 | 20 | 11 | 56 | 156/343 | 33/92 | 87 |
| Avg | | 30:30 | 52.2% | 30.0% | 76.5% | 13.6 | 3.6 | 7.3 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 45.5% | 35.9% | |
| 45-PIT | 53 | 1620:24 | 329/656 | 13/41 | 85/108 | 756 | 60/132/192 | 409 | 44 | 26 | 89 | 324/668 | 68/164 | 147 |
| Avg | 53 | 30:34 | 50.2% | 31.7% | 78.7% | 14.3 | 3.6 | 7.7 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 48.5% | 41.5% | |
| 44-PIT | 53 | 1458:27 | 234/533 | 11/39 | 65/87 | 544 | 65/121/186 | 345 | 33 | 20 | 96 | 277/564 | 54/126 | 148 |
| Avg | 53 | 27:31 | 43.9% | 28.2% | 74.7% | 10.3 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 49.1% | 42.9% | |
| 43-PIT | 42 | 1098:27 | 158/368 | 19/70 | 44/64 | 379 | 39/101/140 | 166 | 38 | 14 | 82 | 249/524 | 49/122 | 136 |
| Avg | 34 | 26:09 | 42.9% | 27.1% | 68.8% | 9.0 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 47.5% | 40.2% | |
| TOTALS | 178 | 5092:04 | 902/1904 | 49/170 | 233/310 | 2086 | 195/431/626 | 1140 | 135 | 71 | 323 | 1006/2099 | 204/504 | 518 |
| Avg | 140 | 28:36 | 47.4% | 28.8% | 75.2% | 11.7 | 3.5 | 6.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 47.9% | 40.5% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-PIT | 5 | 145:56 | 19/49 | 1/6 | 9/11 | 48 | 4/15/19 | 37 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 45/77 | 7/20 | 22 |
| Avg | 5 | 29:11 | 38.8% | 16.7% | 81.8% | 9.6 | 3.8 | 7.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 58.4% | 35.0% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 145:56 | 19/49 | 1/6 | 9/11 | 48 | 4/15/19 | 37 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 45/77 | 7/20 | 22 |
| Avg | 5 | 29:11 | 38.8% | 16.7% | 81.8% | 9.6 | 3.8 | 7.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 58.4% | 35.0% | |
|