|

My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #34 out of 53 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #412, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #223 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 47-NAS | 30 | 947:13 | 140/368 | 20/66 | 50/64 | 350 | 46/91/137 | 70 | 39 | 30 | 49 | 194/419 | 43/93 | 67 |
| Avg | | 31:34 | 38.0% | 30.3% | 78.1% | 11.7 | 4.6 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 46.3% | 46.2% | |
| 46-NAS | 35 | 539:43 | 70/179 | 13/32 | 45/56 | 198 | 23/57/80 | 47 | 22 | 16 | 29 | 87/203 | 10/37 | 50 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:25 | 39.1% | 40.6% | 80.4% | 5.7 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 42.9% | 27.0% | |
| 45-NAS | 53 | 806:46 | 141/302 | 23/52 | 60/88 | 365 | 38/108/146 | 72 | 30 | 28 | 39 | 135/320 | 25/87 | 78 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:13 | 46.7% | 44.2% | 68.2% | 6.9 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 42.2% | 28.7% | |
| 44-NAS | 33 | 484:38 | 62/165 | 5/25 | 38/53 | 167 | 27/49/76 | 26 | 17 | 15 | 28 | 89/201 | 14/44 | 35 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:41 | 37.6% | 20.0% | 71.7% | 5.1 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 44.3% | 31.8% | |
| TOTALS | 151 | 2778:20 | 413/1014 | 61/175 | 193/261 | 1080 | 134/305/439 | 215 | 108 | 89 | 145 | 505/1143 | 92/261 | 230 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:24 | 40.7% | 34.9% | 73.9% | 7.2 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 44.2% | 35.2% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-NAS | 6 | 101:00 | 22/40 | 4/4 | 2/6 | 50 | 4/8/12 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 18/37 | 2/6 | 4 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:50 | 55.0% | 100.0% | 33.3% | 8.3 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 48.6% | 33.3% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 101:00 | 22/40 | 4/4 | 2/6 | 50 | 4/8/12 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 18/37 | 2/6 | 4 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:50 | 55.0% | 100.0% | 33.3% | 8.3 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 48.6% | 33.3% | |
|