|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #48 out of 58
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #656, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #489 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-MXC | 53 | 976:05 | 134/319 | 14/28 | 47/60 | 329 | 48/108/156 | 120 | 22 | 12 | 53 | 187/380 | 45/107 | 110 |
| Avg | | 18:25 | 42.0% | 50.0% | 78.3% | 6.2 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 49.2% | 42.1% | |
| 44-MXC | 53 | 991:40 | 151/361 | 3/24 | 56/82 | 361 | 52/113/165 | 62 | 27 | 14 | 63 | 150/307 | 14/61 | 103 |
| Avg | 2 | 18:43 | 41.8% | 12.5% | 68.3% | 6.8 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 48.9% | 23.0% | |
| TOTALS | 106 | 1967:45 | 285/680 | 17/52 | 103/142 | 690 | 100/221/321 | 182 | 49 | 26 | 116 | 337/687 | 59/168 | 213 |
| Avg | 2 | 18:34 | 41.9% | 32.7% | 72.5% | 6.5 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 49.1% | 35.1% | |
|