|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #55 out of 90
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #614, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #324 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-OTT | 53 | 733:09 | 171/394 | 63/176 | 81/102 | 486 | 41/70/111 | 111 | 16 | 21 | 26 | 96/257 | 17/68 | 66 |
| Avg | | 13:50 | 43.4% | 35.8% | 79.4% | 9.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 37.4% | 25.0% | |
| 40-OTT | 53 | 707:27 | 157/396 | 56/181 | 84/95 | 454 | 34/77/111 | 100 | 21 | 17 | 55 | 141/297 | 21/63 | 75 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:21 | 39.6% | 30.9% | 88.4% | 8.6 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 47.5% | 33.3% | |
| 39-OTT | 53 | 779:12 | 51/159 | 21/77 | 48/56 | 171 | 45/73/118 | 160 | 19 | 11 | 29 | 114/263 | 14/49 | 58 |
| Avg | 2 | 14:42 | 32.1% | 27.3% | 85.7% | 3.2 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 43.3% | 28.6% | |
| 38-OTT | 53 | 620:50 | 83/233 | 16/58 | 43/66 | 225 | 29/61/90 | 58 | 17 | 9 | 32 | 101/219 | 23/46 | 72 |
| Avg | 0 | 11:43 | 35.6% | 27.6% | 65.2% | 4.2 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 46.1% | 50.0% | |
| TOTALS | 212 | 2840:38 | 462/1182 | 156/492 | 256/319 | 1336 | 149/281/430 | 429 | 73 | 58 | 142 | 452/1036 | 75/226 | 271 |
| Avg | 2 | 13:24 | 39.1% | 31.7% | 80.3% | 6.3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 43.6% | 33.2% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 39-OTT | 5 | 56:18 | 4/9 | 2/6 | 7/10 | 17 | 3/3/6 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 24/41 | 7/13 | 9 |
| Avg | 0 | 11:16 | 44.4% | 33.3% | 70.0% | 3.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 58.5% | 53.8% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 56:18 | 4/9 | 2/6 | 7/10 | 17 | 3/3/6 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 24/41 | 7/13 | 9 |
| Avg | 0 | 11:16 | 44.4% | 33.3% | 70.0% | 3.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 58.5% | 53.8% | |
|