|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #16 out of 90
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #204, his statistical rank is #100.
Therefore we believe a salary of 750 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-NO | 53 | 1743:53 | 323/739 | 131/340 | 80/91 | 857 | 54/132/186 | 340 | 30 | 29 | 64 | 300/711 | 82/246 | 146 |
| Avg | | 32:54 | 43.7% | 38.5% | 87.9% | 16.2 | 3.5 | 6.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 42.2% | 33.3% | |
| 40-NO | 53 | 1723:02 | 100/267 | 34/122 | 39/46 | 273 | 53/105/158 | 424 | 42 | 30 | 22 | 344/681 | 97/228 | 133 |
| Avg | 53 | 32:31 | 37.5% | 27.9% | 84.8% | 5.2 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 50.5% | 42.5% | |
| 39-NO | 53 | 1796:40 | 108/293 | 39/119 | 32/42 | 287 | 57/112/169 | 481 | 37 | 18 | 16 | 342/698 | 86/222 | 172 |
| Avg | 53 | 33:54 | 36.9% | 32.8% | 76.2% | 5.4 | 3.2 | 9.1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 49.0% | 38.7% | |
| 38-NO | 48 | 1635:07 | 97/264 | 36/109 | 36/45 | 266 | 46/114/160 | 417 | 40 | 10 | 29 | 341/653 | 89/207 | 171 |
| Avg | 48 | 34:04 | 36.7% | 33.0% | 80.0% | 5.5 | 3.3 | 8.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 52.2% | 43.0% | |
| TOTALS | 207 | 6898:42 | 628/1563 | 240/690 | 187/224 | 1683 | 210/463/673 | 1662 | 149 | 87 | 131 | 1327/2743 | 354/903 | 622 |
| Avg | 154 | 33:20 | 40.2% | 34.8% | 83.5% | 8.1 | 3.3 | 8.0 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 48.4% | 39.2% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 38-NO | 7 | 194:46 | 9/29 | 2/10 | 1/2 | 21 | 6/19/25 | 51 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 50/99 | 14/32 | 33 |
| Avg | 7 | 27:49 | 31.0% | 20.0% | 50.0% | 3.0 | 3.6 | 7.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 50.5% | 43.8% | |
| TOTALS | 7 | 194:46 | 9/29 | 2/10 | 1/2 | 21 | 6/19/25 | 51 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 50/99 | 14/32 | 33 |
| Avg | 7 | 27:49 | 31.0% | 20.0% | 50.0% | 3.0 | 3.6 | 7.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 50.5% | 43.8% | |
|