|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #86 out of 90
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #727, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #696 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-QUE | 53 | 706:07 | 110/283 | 13/55 | 58/74 | 291 | 70/144/214 | 26 | 12 | 26 | 32 | 97/210 | 15/41 | 54 |
| Avg | | 13:19 | 38.9% | 23.6% | 78.4% | 5.5 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 46.2% | 36.6% | |
| 40-QUE | 53 | 738:21 | 121/308 | 14/49 | 73/90 | 329 | 72/130/202 | 36 | 12 | 29 | 29 | 98/229 | 12/37 | 65 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:56 | 39.3% | 28.6% | 81.1% | 6.2 | 3.8 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 42.8% | 32.4% | |
| 39-QUE | 53 | 796:07 | 110/295 | 11/46 | 55/78 | 286 | 68/168/236 | 27 | 18 | 37 | 51 | 127/294 | 14/49 | 69 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:01 | 37.3% | 23.9% | 70.5% | 5.4 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 43.2% | 28.6% | |
| 38-QUE | 2 | 29:41 | 4/9 | 0/1 | 5/6 | 13 | 2/3/5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6/11 | 0/1 | 3 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:51 | 44.4% | 0.0% | 83.3% | 6.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 54.5% | 0.0% | |
| TOTALS | 161 | 2270:16 | 345/895 | 38/151 | 191/248 | 919 | 212/445/657 | 89 | 43 | 93 | 113 | 328/744 | 41/128 | 191 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:06 | 38.5% | 25.2% | 77.0% | 5.7 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 44.1% | 32.0% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 38-QUE | 6 | 88:47 | 15/39 | 1/5 | 12/14 | 43 | 3/22/25 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 14/19 | 0/1 | 3 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:48 | 38.5% | 20.0% | 85.7% | 7.2 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 73.7% | 0.0% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 88:47 | 15/39 | 1/5 | 12/14 | 43 | 3/22/25 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 14/19 | 0/1 | 3 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:48 | 38.5% | 20.0% | 85.7% | 7.2 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 73.7% | 0.0% | |
|