|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #4 out of 70
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #165, his statistical rank is #37.
Therefore we believe a salary of 1600 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 42-OTT | 53 | 1901:28 | 602/1323 | 215/610 | 123/162 | 1542 | 64/139/203 | 264 | 56 | 23 | 162 | 402/888 | 69/211 | 204 |
| Avg | | 35:53 | 45.5% | 35.2% | 75.9% | 29.1 | 3.8 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 3.1 | 45.3% | 32.7% | |
| 41-OTT | 49 | 1721:57 | 435/1026 | 167/482 | 109/138 | 1146 | 64/140/204 | 238 | 37 | 10 | 139 | 303/670 | 52/156 | 197 |
| Avg | 49 | 35:09 | 42.4% | 34.6% | 79.0% | 23.4 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 45.2% | 33.3% | |
| 40-OTT | 53 | 1841:33 | 303/740 | 98/327 | 119/150 | 823 | 54/146/200 | 289 | 42 | 6 | 104 | 345/673 | 60/157 | 208 |
| Avg | 53 | 34:45 | 40.9% | 30.0% | 79.3% | 15.5 | 3.8 | 5.5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 51.3% | 38.2% | |
| 39-OTT | 51 | 1755:06 | 226/507 | 34/97 | 58/72 | 544 | 47/142/189 | 423 | 30 | 4 | 81 | 292/594 | 42/105 | 197 |
| Avg | 51 | 34:25 | 44.6% | 35.1% | 80.6% | 10.7 | 3.7 | 8.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 49.2% | 40.0% | |
| TOTALS | 206 | 7220:04 | 1566/3596 | 514/1516 | 409/522 | 4055 | 229/567/796 | 1214 | 165 | 43 | 486 | 1342/2825 | 223/629 | 806 |
| Avg | 153 | 35:03 | 43.5% | 33.9% | 78.4% | 19.7 | 3.9 | 5.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 47.5% | 35.5% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 39-OTT | 5 | 182:39 | 30/64 | 3/9 | 10/12 | 73 | 13/17/30 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 27/38 | 4/5 | 21 |
| Avg | 5 | 36:32 | 46.9% | 33.3% | 83.3% | 14.6 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 71.1% | 80.0% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 182:39 | 30/64 | 3/9 | 10/12 | 73 | 13/17/30 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 27/38 | 4/5 | 21 |
| Avg | 5 | 36:32 | 46.9% | 33.3% | 83.3% | 14.6 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 71.1% | 80.0% | |
|