|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #35 out of 60
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #461, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #437 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-KC | 4 | 71:14 | 7/13 | 0/4 | 3/4 | 17 | 4/14/18 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2/17 | 0/2 | 0 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:49 | 53.8% | 0.0% | 75.0% | 4.3 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 11.8% | 0.0% | |
| TOTALS | 4 | 71:14 | 7/13 | 0/4 | 3/4 | 17 | 4/14/18 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2/17 | 0/2 | 0 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:49 | 53.8% | 0.0% | 75.0% | 4.3 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 11.8% | 0.0% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 46-SJU | 23 | 441:36 | 62/131 | 11/23 | 27/34 | 162 | 30/51/81 | 89 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 74/198 | 13/39 | 41 |
| Avg | 0 | 19:12 | 47.3% | 47.8% | 79.4% | 7.0 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 37.4% | 33.3% | |
| 44-SFE | 27 | 468:05 | 55/121 | 7/23 | 36/49 | 153 | 31/46/77 | 104 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 101/196 | 23/50 | 42 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:20 | 45.5% | 30.4% | 73.5% | 5.7 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 51.5% | 46.0% | |
| 42-SFE | 12 | 183:11 | 37/92 | 1/10 | 17/19 | 92 | 17/34/51 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 13 | 20/42 | 1/7 | 10 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:16 | 40.2% | 10.0% | 89.5% | 7.7 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 47.6% | 14.3% | |
| 39-SFE | 41 | 876:16 | 82/190 | 7/27 | 23/35 | 194 | 72/161/233 | 50 | 14 | 43 | 21 | 141/340 | 19/57 | 77 |
| Avg | 14 | 21:22 | 43.2% | 25.9% | 65.7% | 4.7 | 5.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 41.5% | 33.3% | |
| TOTALS | 103 | 1969:08 | 236/534 | 26/83 | 103/137 | 601 | 150/292/442 | 250 | 46 | 84 | 47 | 336/776 | 56/153 | 170 |
| Avg | 14 | 19:07 | 44.2% | 31.3% | 75.2% | 5.8 | 4.3 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 43.3% | 36.6% | |
|