|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #50 out of 70
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #612, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #360 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 42-DET | 53 | 808:08 | 77/164 | 42/82 | 46/52 | 242 | 43/95/138 | 46 | 26 | 23 | 10 | 127/315 | 16/64 | 84 |
| Avg | | 15:15 | 47.0% | 51.2% | 88.5% | 4.6 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 40.3% | 25.0% | |
| 41-DET | 23 | 350:10 | 45/97 | 24/50 | 27/28 | 141 | 21/41/62 | 21 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 56/124 | 8/24 | 31 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:13 | 46.4% | 48.0% | 96.4% | 6.1 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 45.2% | 33.3% | |
| 40-DET | 1 | 14:27 | 2/8 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 5 | 0/1/1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 3 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:27 | 25.0% | 25.0% | | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 66.7% | | |
| 39-DET | 49 | 1071:54 | 108/295 | 38/138 | 51/70 | 305 | 55/107/162 | 70 | 35 | 13 | 27 | 203/404 | 26/68 | 131 |
| Avg | 22 | 21:53 | 36.6% | 27.5% | 72.9% | 6.2 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 50.2% | 38.2% | |
| TOTALS | 126 | 2244:39 | 232/564 | 105/274 | 124/150 | 693 | 119/244/363 | 138 | 65 | 47 | 44 | 388/846 | 50/156 | 249 |
| Avg | 22 | 17:49 | 41.1% | 38.3% | 82.7% | 5.5 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 45.9% | 32.1% | |
|