My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #68 out of 77 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #741, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #595 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-CLA | 17 | 251:14 | 41/99 | 5/19 | 17/18 | 104 | 7/26/33 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 10/24 | 0/6 | 9 |
Avg | | 14:47 | 41.4% | 26.3% | 94.4% | 6.1 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 41.7% | 0.0% | |
TOTALS | 17 | 251:14 | 41/99 | 5/19 | 17/18 | 104 | 7/26/33 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 10/24 | 0/6 | 9 |
Avg | 0 | 14:47 | 41.4% | 26.3% | 94.4% | 6.1 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 41.7% | 0.0% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-CLA | 3 | 46:25 | 3/17 | 0/1 | 6/6 | 12 | 2/5/7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18/35 | 6/14 | 4 |
Avg | | 15:28 | 17.6% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 4.0 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 51.4% | 42.9% | |
TOTALS | 3 | 46:25 | 3/17 | 0/1 | 6/6 | 12 | 2/5/7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18/35 | 6/14 | 4 |
Avg | 0 | 15:28 | 17.6% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 4.0 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 51.4% | 42.9% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
40-CLA | 52 | 888:52 | 136/306 | 10/46 | 82/101 | 364 | 48/74/122 | 138 | 15 | 8 | 28 | 159/346 | 29/88 | 106 |
Avg | 0 | 17:06 | 44.4% | 21.7% | 81.2% | 7.0 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 46.0% | 33.0% | |
TOTALS | 52 | 888:52 | 136/306 | 10/46 | 82/101 | 364 | 48/74/122 | 138 | 15 | 8 | 28 | 159/346 | 29/88 | 106 |
Avg | 0 | 17:06 | 44.4% | 21.7% | 81.2% | 7.0 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 46.0% | 33.0% | |
|