
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #52 out of 62 While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #533, his statistical rank is #249. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-JAX | 53 | 1016:04 | 215/452 | 40/99 | 66/103 | 536 | 58/124/182 | 46 | 40 | 34 | 32 | 175/388 | 35/77 | 86 |
Avg | | 19:10 | 47.6% | 40.4% | 64.1% | 10.1 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 45.1% | 45.5% | |
TOTALS | 53 | 1016:04 | 215/452 | 40/99 | 66/103 | 536 | 58/124/182 | 46 | 40 | 34 | 32 | 175/388 | 35/77 | 86 |
Avg | 0 | 19:10 | 47.6% | 40.4% | 64.1% | 10.1 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 45.1% | 45.5% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-JAX | 5 | 90:45 | 14/44 | 1/12 | 9/11 | 38 | 4/11/15 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 16/30 | 0/1 | 2 |
Avg | | 18:09 | 31.8% | 8.3% | 81.8% | 7.6 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 53.3% | 0.0% | |
TOTALS | 5 | 90:45 | 14/44 | 1/12 | 9/11 | 38 | 4/11/15 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 16/30 | 0/1 | 2 |
Avg | 0 | 18:09 | 31.8% | 8.3% | 81.8% | 7.6 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 53.3% | 0.0% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-JAX | 25 | 490:32 | 35/91 | 9/23 | 23/32 | 102 | 33/64/97 | 23 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 69/159 | 16/39 | 37 |
Avg | 0 | 19:37 | 38.5% | 39.1% | 71.9% | 4.1 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 43.4% | 41.0% | |
40-OTT | 51 | 614:21 | 58/177 | 10/37 | 19/28 | 145 | 51/83/134 | 40 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 95/194 | 20/57 | 56 |
Avg | 1 | 12:03 | 32.8% | 27.0% | 67.9% | 2.8 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 49.0% | 35.1% | |
TOTALS | 76 | 1104:53 | 93/268 | 19/60 | 42/60 | 247 | 84/147/231 | 63 | 35 | 37 | 16 | 164/353 | 36/96 | 93 |
Avg | 1 | 14:32 | 34.7% | 31.7% | 70.0% | 3.3 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 46.5% | 37.5% | |
|