|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #46 out of 53
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #423, his statistical rank is #121.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-LR | 48 | 1454:01 | 299/562 | 16/35 | 88/111 | 702 | 63/136/199 | 292 | 43 | 25 | 40 | 284/647 | 58/186 | 126 |
| Avg | | 30:18 | 53.2% | 45.7% | 79.3% | 14.6 | 4.1 | 6.1 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 43.9% | 31.2% | |
| 42-LR | 53 | 1659:35 | 273/592 | 17/48 | 82/94 | 645 | 63/149/212 | 312 | 52 | 25 | 40 | 303/666 | 61/175 | 179 |
| Avg | 53 | 31:19 | 46.1% | 35.4% | 87.2% | 12.2 | 4.0 | 5.9 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 45.5% | 34.9% | |
| 41-LR | 53 | 1623:11 | 305/681 | 12/36 | 77/94 | 699 | 52/153/205 | 372 | 30 | 16 | 53 | 281/634 | 61/176 | 168 |
| Avg | 53 | 30:38 | 44.8% | 33.3% | 81.9% | 13.2 | 3.9 | 7.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 44.3% | 34.7% | |
| 40-LR | 53 | 1642:48 | 315/727 | 11/36 | 113/158 | 754 | 71/181/252 | 120 | 48 | 27 | 54 | 315/722 | 62/171 | 192 |
| Avg | 53 | 31:00 | 43.3% | 30.6% | 71.5% | 14.2 | 4.8 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 43.6% | 36.3% | |
| TOTALS | 207 | 6379:35 | 1192/2562 | 56/155 | 360/457 | 2800 | 249/619/868 | 1096 | 173 | 93 | 187 | 1183/2669 | 242/708 | 665 |
| Avg | 159 | 30:49 | 46.5% | 36.1% | 78.8% | 13.5 | 4.2 | 5.3 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 44.3% | 34.2% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 40-LR | 6 | 194:50 | 39/129 | 4/8 | 8/9 | 90 | 10/12/22 | 10 | 13 | 3 | 16 | 49/108 | 26/63 | 24 |
| Avg | 6 | 32:28 | 30.2% | 50.0% | 88.9% | 15.0 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 2.7 | 45.4% | 41.3% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 194:50 | 39/129 | 4/8 | 8/9 | 90 | 10/12/22 | 10 | 13 | 3 | 16 | 49/108 | 26/63 | 24 |
| Avg | 6 | 32:28 | 30.2% | 50.0% | 88.9% | 15.0 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 45.4% | 41.3% | |
|