
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #49 out of 53 While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #404, his statistical rank is #166. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
43-HAR | 20 | 690:44 | 120/278 | 35/99 | 46/52 | 321 | 53/112/165 | 51 | 22 | 14 | 28 | 136/273 | 21/58 | 65 |
Avg | | 34:32 | 43.2% | 35.4% | 88.5% | 16.1 | 8.3 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 49.8% | 36.2% | |
41-HAR | 53 | 836:34 | 108/251 | 16/46 | 50/55 | 282 | 48/150/198 | 43 | 19 | 29 | 44 | 139/282 | 17/41 | 73 |
Avg | 2 | 15:47 | 43.0% | 34.8% | 90.9% | 5.3 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 49.3% | 41.5% | |
40-HAR | 43 | 580:09 | 75/175 | 10/40 | 28/37 | 188 | 38/66/104 | 35 | 14 | 14 | 26 | 91/191 | 8/29 | 48 |
Avg | 0 | 13:30 | 42.9% | 25.0% | 75.7% | 4.4 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 47.6% | 27.6% | |
TOTALS | 116 | 2107:27 | 303/704 | 61/185 | 124/144 | 791 | 139/328/467 | 129 | 55 | 57 | 98 | 366/746 | 46/128 | 186 |
Avg | 2 | 18:10 | 43.0% | 33.0% | 86.1% | 6.8 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 49.1% | 35.9% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-HAR | 17 | 232:12 | 26/53 | 6/13 | 10/13 | 68 | 16/34/50 | 10 | 3 | 13 | 6 | 40/81 | 8/13 | 24 |
Avg | 0 | 13:40 | 49.1% | 46.2% | 76.9% | 4.0 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 49.4% | 61.5% | |
40-HAR | 12 | 159:14 | 14/43 | 4/11 | 10/11 | 42 | 5/22/27 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 24/46 | 8/15 | 6 |
Avg | 0 | 13:16 | 32.6% | 36.4% | 90.9% | 3.5 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 52.2% | 53.3% | |
TOTALS | 29 | 391:26 | 40/96 | 10/24 | 20/24 | 110 | 21/56/77 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 19 | 64/127 | 16/28 | 30 |
Avg | 0 | 13:30 | 41.7% | 41.7% | 83.3% | 3.8 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 50.4% | 57.1% | |
|