
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #43 out of 53 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #402, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #278 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
43-SJU | 26 | 801:37 | 117/264 | 7/20 | 32/39 | 273 | 40/128/168 | 34 | 26 | 32 | 40 | 95/225 | 7/32 | 56 |
Avg | | 30:50 | 44.3% | 35.0% | 82.1% | 10.5 | 6.5 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 42.2% | 21.9% | |
42-SJU | 46 | 1225:55 | 159/394 | 11/35 | 61/86 | 390 | 88/162/250 | 103 | 49 | 33 | 60 | 238/529 | 42/140 | 121 |
Avg | 28 | 26:39 | 40.4% | 31.4% | 70.9% | 8.5 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 45.0% | 30.0% | |
41-CAR | 53 | 858:36 | 77/227 | 4/14 | 42/51 | 200 | 51/133/184 | 60 | 20 | 24 | 42 | 108/291 | 12/65 | 71 |
Avg | 0 | 16:12 | 33.9% | 28.6% | 82.4% | 3.8 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 37.1% | 18.5% | |
40-CAR | 51 | 851:47 | 90/254 | 3/13 | 37/52 | 220 | 40/109/149 | 51 | 24 | 20 | 36 | 109/269 | 19/63 | 70 |
Avg | 0 | 16:42 | 35.4% | 23.1% | 71.2% | 4.3 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 40.5% | 30.2% | |
TOTALS | 176 | 3737:55 | 443/1139 | 25/82 | 172/228 | 1083 | 219/532/751 | 248 | 119 | 109 | 178 | 550/1314 | 80/300 | 318 |
Avg | 28 | 21:14 | 38.9% | 30.5% | 75.4% | 6.2 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 41.9% | 26.7% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-CAR | 12 | 204:50 | 17/40 | 2/4 | 4/5 | 40 | 12/42/54 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 31/63 | 7/23 | 18 |
Avg | 0 | 17:04 | 42.5% | 50.0% | 80.0% | 3.3 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 49.2% | 30.4% | |
TOTALS | 12 | 204:50 | 17/40 | 2/4 | 4/5 | 40 | 12/42/54 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 31/63 | 7/23 | 18 |
Avg | 0 | 17:04 | 42.5% | 50.0% | 80.0% | 3.3 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 49.2% | 30.4% | |
|