|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #6 out of 53
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #81, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #55 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 1593 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-JAX | 52 | 1496:25 | 503/999 | 19/55 | 167/203 | 1192 | 67/150/217 | 89 | 40 | 45 | 84 | 353/726 | 48/137 | 153 |
| Avg | | 28:47 | 50.4% | 34.5% | 82.3% | 22.9 | 4.2 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 48.6% | 35.0% | |
| 42-JAX | 47 | 1352:38 | 431/989 | 60/174 | 112/134 | 1034 | 74/93/167 | 203 | 38 | 17 | 103 | 208/465 | 43/116 | 138 |
| Avg | 47 | 28:47 | 43.6% | 34.5% | 83.6% | 22.0 | 3.6 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 44.7% | 37.1% | |
| 41-JAX | 53 | 1415:27 | 183/412 | 23/70 | 86/95 | 475 | 51/132/183 | 270 | 34 | 21 | 43 | 234/540 | 47/148 | 148 |
| Avg | 53 | 26:42 | 44.4% | 32.9% | 90.5% | 9.0 | 3.5 | 5.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 43.3% | 31.8% | |
| 40-JAX | 10 | 294:21 | 23/59 | 4/12 | 8/11 | 58 | 19/26/45 | 58 | 13 | 2 | 7 | 48/109 | 6/30 | 28 |
| Avg | 10 | 29:26 | 39.0% | 33.3% | 72.7% | 5.8 | 4.5 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 44.0% | 20.0% | |
| TOTALS | 162 | 4558:51 | 1140/2459 | 106/311 | 373/443 | 2759 | 211/401/612 | 620 | 125 | 85 | 237 | 843/1840 | 144/431 | 467 |
| Avg | 110 | 28:08 | 46.4% | 34.1% | 84.2% | 17.0 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 45.8% | 33.4% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 40-JAX | 6 | 174:53 | 17/28 | 2/4 | 5/6 | 41 | 3/27/30 | 37 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19/49 | 1/11 | 15 |
| Avg | 6 | 29:09 | 60.7% | 50.0% | 83.3% | 6.8 | 5.0 | 6.2 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 38.8% | 9.1% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 174:53 | 17/28 | 2/4 | 5/6 | 41 | 3/27/30 | 37 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 19/49 | 1/11 | 15 |
| Avg | 6 | 29:09 | 60.7% | 50.0% | 83.3% | 6.8 | 5.0 | 6.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 38.8% | 9.1% | |
|