|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #36 out of 53
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #226, his statistical rank is #204.
Therefore we believe a salary of 555 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-CAR | 53 | 1728:31 | 375/716 | 9/38 | 78/109 | 837 | 54/139/193 | 359 | 49 | 32 | 52 | 335/751 | 58/175 | 169 |
| Avg | | 32:37 | 52.4% | 23.7% | 71.6% | 15.8 | 3.6 | 6.8 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 44.6% | 33.1% | |
| 42-CAR | 53 | 1694:01 | 279/575 | 14/48 | 83/103 | 655 | 53/147/200 | 314 | 40 | 21 | 53 | 296/656 | 61/169 | 175 |
| Avg | 53 | 31:58 | 48.5% | 29.2% | 80.6% | 12.4 | 3.8 | 5.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 45.1% | 36.1% | |
| 41-CAR | 53 | 1667:40 | 272/602 | 10/33 | 81/110 | 635 | 89/135/224 | 142 | 38 | 27 | 81 | 303/710 | 61/194 | 182 |
| Avg | 53 | 31:28 | 45.2% | 30.3% | 73.6% | 12.0 | 4.2 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 42.7% | 31.4% | |
| 40-CAR | 53 | 1035:24 | 130/294 | 7/24 | 72/105 | 339 | 42/97/139 | 164 | 18 | 8 | 39 | 200/446 | 40/121 | 119 |
| Avg | 11 | 19:32 | 44.2% | 29.2% | 68.6% | 6.4 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 44.8% | 33.1% | |
| TOTALS | 212 | 6125:36 | 1056/2187 | 40/143 | 314/427 | 2466 | 238/518/756 | 979 | 145 | 88 | 225 | 1134/2563 | 220/659 | 645 |
| Avg | 117 | 28:54 | 48.3% | 28.0% | 73.5% | 11.6 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 44.2% | 33.4% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-CAR | 12 | 197:43 | 43/93 | 0/6 | 19/28 | 105 | 5/14/19 | 28 | 13 | 1 | 14 | 25/41 | 6/10 | 17 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:29 | 46.2% | 0.0% | 67.9% | 8.8 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 61.0% | 60.0% | |
| TOTALS | 12 | 197:43 | 43/93 | 0/6 | 19/28 | 105 | 5/14/19 | 28 | 13 | 1 | 14 | 25/41 | 6/10 | 17 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:29 | 46.2% | 0.0% | 67.9% | 8.8 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 61.0% | 60.0% | |
|