|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #28 out of 53
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #255, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #111 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 615 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-LR | 53 | 1674:00 | 303/619 | 12/33 | 103/126 | 721 | 87/194/281 | 109 | 50 | 56 | 39 | 273/604 | 43/128 | 135 |
| Avg | | 31:35 | 48.9% | 36.4% | 81.7% | 13.6 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 45.2% | 33.6% | |
| 42-LR | 53 | 1667:38 | 306/647 | 16/38 | 84/104 | 712 | 76/181/257 | 105 | 60 | 58 | 52 | 285/669 | 40/138 | 149 |
| Avg | 53 | 31:28 | 47.3% | 42.1% | 80.8% | 13.4 | 4.8 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 42.6% | 29.0% | |
| 41-LR | 53 | 1689:11 | 397/861 | 20/54 | 118/143 | 932 | 77/161/238 | 117 | 67 | 37 | 76 | 343/753 | 59/179 | 171 |
| Avg | 53 | 31:52 | 46.1% | 37.0% | 82.5% | 17.6 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 45.6% | 33.0% | |
| 40-LR | 49 | 1453:11 | 255/636 | 6/34 | 99/115 | 615 | 79/132/211 | 271 | 23 | 17 | 43 | 263/550 | 55/166 | 159 |
| Avg | 48 | 29:39 | 40.1% | 17.6% | 86.1% | 12.6 | 4.3 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 47.8% | 33.1% | |
| TOTALS | 208 | 6484:00 | 1261/2763 | 54/159 | 404/488 | 2980 | 319/668/987 | 602 | 200 | 168 | 210 | 1164/2576 | 197/611 | 614 |
| Avg | 154 | 31:10 | 45.6% | 34.0% | 82.8% | 14.3 | 4.7 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 45.2% | 32.2% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 40-LR | 6 | 96:30 | 1/9 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 10 | 4/9/13 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 23/72 | 7/30 | 19 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:05 | 11.1% | | 100.0% | 1.7 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 31.9% | 23.3% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 96:30 | 1/9 | 0/0 | 8/8 | 10 | 4/9/13 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 23/72 | 7/30 | 19 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:05 | 11.1% | | 100.0% | 1.7 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 31.9% | 23.3% | |
|