
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #17 out of 62 While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #136, his statistical rank is #103. Therefore we believe a salary of 709 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-KNX | 53 | 1720:00 | 403/893 | 44/126 | 91/109 | 941 | 99/224/323 | 87 | 41 | 52 | 64 | 278/646 | 38/122 | 146 |
Avg | | 32:27 | 45.1% | 34.9% | 83.5% | 17.8 | 6.1 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 43.0% | 31.1% | |
TOTALS | 53 | 1720:00 | 403/893 | 44/126 | 91/109 | 941 | 99/224/323 | 87 | 41 | 52 | 64 | 278/646 | 38/122 | 146 |
Avg | 0 | 32:27 | 45.1% | 34.9% | 83.5% | 17.8 | 6.1 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 43.0% | 31.1% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-KNX | 6 | 194:57 | 40/91 | 5/16 | 16/19 | 101 | 6/16/22 | 16 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 35/63 | 5/13 | 15 |
Avg | | 32:30 | 44.0% | 31.3% | 84.2% | 16.8 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 55.6% | 38.5% | |
TOTALS | 6 | 194:57 | 40/91 | 5/16 | 16/19 | 101 | 6/16/22 | 16 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 35/63 | 5/13 | 15 |
Avg | 0 | 32:30 | 44.0% | 31.3% | 84.2% | 16.8 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 55.6% | 38.5% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-KNX | 53 | 1735:35 | 399/961 | 40/154 | 89/134 | 927 | 93/218/311 | 98 | 45 | 46 | 63 | 279/586 | 56/138 | 149 |
Avg | 53 | 32:45 | 41.5% | 26.0% | 66.4% | 17.5 | 5.9 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 47.6% | 40.6% | |
40-KNX | 51 | 925:41 | 137/347 | 16/53 | 59/82 | 349 | 50/112/162 | 46 | 17 | 13 | 33 | 128/308 | 22/64 | 95 |
Avg | 0 | 18:09 | 39.5% | 30.2% | 72.0% | 6.8 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 41.6% | 34.4% | |
TOTALS | 104 | 2661:16 | 536/1308 | 56/207 | 148/216 | 1276 | 143/330/473 | 144 | 62 | 59 | 96 | 407/894 | 78/202 | 244 |
Avg | 53 | 25:35 | 41.0% | 27.1% | 68.5% | 12.3 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 45.5% | 38.6% | |
|