|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #17 out of 53
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #302, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #214 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 825 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-PIT | 23 | 706:14 | 58/116 | 6/12 | 14/19 | 136 | 30/56/86 | 167 | 19 | 5 | 10 | 110/260 | 16/69 | 68 |
| Avg | | 30:42 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 73.7% | 5.9 | 3.7 | 7.3 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 42.3% | 23.2% | |
| 42-PIT | 53 | 1679:31 | 95/214 | 7/13 | 33/42 | 230 | 69/167/236 | 171 | 48 | 27 | 11 | 357/781 | 63/212 | 173 |
| Avg | 53 | 31:41 | 44.4% | 53.8% | 78.6% | 4.3 | 4.5 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 45.7% | 29.7% | |
| 41-PIT | 50 | 1526:42 | 121/243 | 5/19 | 38/44 | 285 | 57/128/185 | 135 | 35 | 26 | 24 | 296/660 | 55/170 | 184 |
| Avg | 50 | 30:32 | 49.8% | 26.3% | 86.4% | 5.7 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 44.8% | 32.4% | |
| 40-PIT | 43 | 1214:20 | 125/278 | 0/11 | 32/50 | 282 | 38/111/149 | 109 | 42 | 14 | 21 | 236/485 | 54/125 | 144 |
| Avg | 43 | 28:14 | 45.0% | 0.0% | 64.0% | 6.6 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 48.7% | 43.2% | |
| TOTALS | 169 | 5126:47 | 399/851 | 18/55 | 117/155 | 933 | 194/462/656 | 582 | 144 | 72 | 66 | 999/2186 | 188/576 | 569 |
| Avg | 146 | 30:20 | 46.9% | 32.7% | 75.5% | 5.5 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 45.7% | 32.6% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 42-PIT | 9 | 292:31 | 23/39 | 2/4 | 7/8 | 55 | 12/24/36 | 30 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 58/112 | 10/27 | 28 |
| Avg | 9 | 32:30 | 59.0% | 50.0% | 87.5% | 6.1 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 51.8% | 37.0% | |
| TOTALS | 9 | 292:31 | 23/39 | 2/4 | 7/8 | 55 | 12/24/36 | 30 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 58/112 | 10/27 | 28 |
| Avg | 9 | 32:30 | 59.0% | 50.0% | 87.5% | 6.1 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 51.8% | 37.0% | |
|