
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #33 out of 59 While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #259, his statistical rank is #118. Therefore we believe a salary of 525 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
43-DET | 39 | 1259:52 | 310/682 | 40/155 | 77/97 | 737 | 70/125/195 | 91 | 41 | 29 | 90 | 212/485 | 32/112 | 119 |
Avg | | 32:18 | 45.5% | 25.8% | 79.4% | 18.9 | 5.0 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 43.7% | 28.6% | |
TOTALS | 39 | 1259:52 | 310/682 | 40/155 | 77/97 | 737 | 70/125/195 | 91 | 41 | 29 | 90 | 212/485 | 32/112 | 119 |
Avg | 0 | 32:18 | 45.5% | 25.8% | 79.4% | 18.9 | 5.0 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 43.7% | 28.6% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
43-DET | 3 | 95:08 | 22/43 | 2/4 | 9/10 | 55 | 3/7/10 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 16/32 | 1/9 | 8 |
Avg | | 31:43 | 51.2% | 50.0% | 90.0% | 18.3 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 50.0% | 11.1% | |
TOTALS | 3 | 95:08 | 22/43 | 2/4 | 9/10 | 55 | 3/7/10 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 16/32 | 1/9 | 8 |
Avg | 0 | 31:43 | 51.2% | 50.0% | 90.0% | 18.3 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 50.0% | 11.1% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-DET | 53 | 1744:47 | 221/562 | 94/285 | 82/99 | 618 | 96/190/286 | 150 | 63 | 28 | 101 | 355/694 | 68/179 | 177 |
Avg | 53 | 32:55 | 39.3% | 33.0% | 82.8% | 11.7 | 5.4 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 51.2% | 38.0% | |
41-DET | 53 | 1373:53 | 177/461 | 79/220 | 77/96 | 510 | 69/132/201 | 112 | 33 | 30 | 95 | 260/558 | 44/128 | 164 |
Avg | 35 | 25:55 | 38.4% | 35.9% | 80.2% | 9.6 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 46.6% | 34.4% | |
TOTALS | 106 | 3118:40 | 398/1023 | 173/505 | 159/195 | 1128 | 165/322/487 | 262 | 96 | 58 | 196 | 615/1252 | 112/307 | 341 |
Avg | 88 | 29:25 | 38.9% | 34.3% | 81.5% | 10.6 | 4.6 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 49.1% | 36.5% | |
|