|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #27 out of 55
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #299, his statistical rank is #158.
Therefore we believe a salary of 600 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-NAS | 39 | 1285:36 | 232/472 | 31/70 | 70/79 | 565 | 56/152/208 | 89 | 65 | 46 | 83 | 216/496 | 43/111 | 105 |
| Avg | | 32:58 | 49.2% | 44.3% | 88.6% | 14.5 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 43.5% | 38.7% | |
| 43-NAS | 53 | 1416:59 | 245/497 | 28/84 | 93/107 | 611 | 65/180/245 | 78 | 52 | 34 | 72 | 226/526 | 41/133 | 126 |
| Avg | 34 | 26:44 | 49.3% | 33.3% | 86.9% | 11.5 | 4.6 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 43.0% | 30.8% | |
| 42-NAS | 46 | 947:14 | 140/301 | 16/44 | 62/77 | 358 | 62/104/166 | 89 | 32 | 19 | 44 | 148/346 | 33/94 | 94 |
| Avg | 11 | 20:36 | 46.5% | 36.4% | 80.5% | 7.8 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 42.8% | 35.1% | |
| 41-NAS | 53 | 1752:11 | 266/639 | 29/109 | 94/118 | 655 | 76/209/285 | 89 | 51 | 29 | 145 | 296/640 | 56/176 | 161 |
| Avg | 53 | 33:04 | 41.6% | 26.6% | 79.7% | 12.4 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.7 | 46.3% | 31.8% | |
| TOTALS | 191 | 5402:00 | 883/1909 | 104/307 | 319/381 | 2189 | 259/645/904 | 345 | 200 | 128 | 344 | 886/2008 | 173/514 | 486 |
| Avg | 98 | 28:17 | 46.3% | 33.9% | 83.7% | 11.5 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 44.1% | 33.7% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 42-NAS | 5 | 85:32 | 13/36 | 2/5 | 5/6 | 33 | 10/6/16 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 28/42 | 10/17 | 10 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:06 | 36.1% | 40.0% | 83.3% | 6.6 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 66.7% | 58.8% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 85:32 | 13/36 | 2/5 | 5/6 | 33 | 10/6/16 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 28/42 | 10/17 | 10 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:06 | 36.1% | 40.0% | 83.3% | 6.6 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 66.7% | 58.8% | |
|