
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #45 out of 55 While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #667, his statistical rank is #132. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
44-ORL | 13 | 414:44 | 74/157 | 16/47 | 19/22 | 183 | 19/53/72 | 34 | 26 | 9 | 23 | 100/206 | 32/85 | 47 |
Avg | | 31:54 | 47.1% | 34.0% | 86.4% | 14.1 | 5.5 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 48.5% | 37.6% | |
TOTALS | 13 | 414:44 | 74/157 | 16/47 | 19/22 | 183 | 19/53/72 | 34 | 26 | 9 | 23 | 100/206 | 32/85 | 47 |
Avg | 0 | 31:54 | 47.1% | 34.0% | 86.4% | 14.1 | 5.5 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 48.5% | 37.6% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
44-OTT | 26 | 917:06 | 261/550 | 31/81 | 64/82 | 617 | 51/91/142 | 52 | 34 | 26 | 102 | 179/413 | 26/105 | 85 |
Avg | | 35:16 | 47.5% | 38.3% | 78.0% | 23.7 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 3.9 | 43.3% | 24.8% | |
43-OTT | 53 | 1196:49 | 372/779 | 44/126 | 91/119 | 879 | 53/117/170 | 146 | 36 | 24 | 111 | 249/506 | 55/135 | 117 |
Avg | 23 | 22:35 | 47.8% | 34.9% | 76.5% | 16.6 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 49.2% | 40.7% | |
42-OTT | 53 | 638:19 | 70/183 | 11/34 | 43/61 | 194 | 28/64/92 | 50 | 23 | 17 | 31 | 149/299 | 24/69 | 80 |
Avg | 0 | 12:03 | 38.3% | 32.4% | 70.5% | 3.7 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 49.8% | 34.8% | |
41-OTT | 53 | 665:23 | 47/126 | 4/23 | 22/29 | 120 | 28/77/105 | 55 | 17 | 8 | 24 | 120/242 | 24/68 | 68 |
Avg | 2 | 12:33 | 37.3% | 17.4% | 75.9% | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 49.6% | 35.3% | |
TOTALS | 185 | 3417:37 | 750/1638 | 90/264 | 220/291 | 1810 | 160/349/509 | 303 | 110 | 75 | 268 | 697/1460 | 129/377 | 350 |
Avg | 25 | 18:28 | 45.8% | 34.1% | 75.6% | 9.8 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 47.7% | 34.2% | |
|