
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #26 out of 62 While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #705, his statistical rank is #640. Therefore we believe a salary of 577 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-KNX | 53 | 801:34 | 104/285 | 12/41 | 45/62 | 265 | 93/179/272 | 35 | 23 | 37 | 60 | 94/245 | 21/49 | 65 |
Avg | | 15:07 | 36.5% | 29.3% | 72.6% | 5.0 | 5.1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 38.4% | 42.9% | |
TOTALS | 53 | 801:34 | 104/285 | 12/41 | 45/62 | 265 | 93/179/272 | 35 | 23 | 37 | 60 | 94/245 | 21/49 | 65 |
Avg | 0 | 15:07 | 36.5% | 29.3% | 72.6% | 5.0 | 5.1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 38.4% | 42.9% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-KNX | 6 | 90:27 | 12/28 | 2/7 | 3/5 | 29 | 13/23/36 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 11/19 | 1/1 | 2 |
Avg | | 15:05 | 42.9% | 28.6% | 60.0% | 4.8 | 6.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 57.9% | 100.0% | |
TOTALS | 6 | 90:27 | 12/28 | 2/7 | 3/5 | 29 | 13/23/36 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 11/19 | 1/1 | 2 |
Avg | 0 | 15:05 | 42.9% | 28.6% | 60.0% | 4.8 | 6.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 57.9% | 100.0% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-KNX | 47 | 701:40 | 101/250 | 15/43 | 43/66 | 260 | 76/145/221 | 25 | 12 | 40 | 62 | 107/230 | 9/39 | 53 |
Avg | 0 | 14:56 | 40.4% | 34.9% | 65.2% | 5.5 | 4.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 46.5% | 23.1% | |
TOTALS | 47 | 701:40 | 101/250 | 15/43 | 43/66 | 260 | 76/145/221 | 25 | 12 | 40 | 62 | 107/230 | 9/39 | 53 |
Avg | 0 | 14:56 | 40.4% | 34.9% | 65.2% | 5.5 | 4.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 46.5% | 23.1% | |
|