
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #54 out of 62 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #625, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #511 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-HAR | 53 | 744:24 | 133/312 | 20/57 | 63/77 | 349 | 43/70/113 | 58 | 23 | 7 | 49 | 118/255 | 21/60 | 74 |
Avg | | 14:03 | 42.6% | 35.1% | 81.8% | 6.6 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 46.3% | 35.0% | |
TOTALS | 53 | 744:24 | 133/312 | 20/57 | 63/77 | 349 | 43/70/113 | 58 | 23 | 7 | 49 | 118/255 | 21/60 | 74 |
Avg | 0 | 14:03 | 42.6% | 35.1% | 81.8% | 6.6 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 46.3% | 35.0% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-HAR | 15 | 195:04 | 40/80 | 1/9 | 23/26 | 104 | 8/13/21 | 19 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 38/79 | 9/21 | 16 |
Avg | | 13:00 | 50.0% | 11.1% | 88.5% | 6.9 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 48.1% | 42.9% | |
41-HAR | 1 | 12:18 | 2/3 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 5 | 1/0/1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0 |
Avg | | 12:18 | 66.7% | 50.0% | | 5.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | | |
TOTALS | 16 | 207:22 | 42/83 | 2/11 | 23/26 | 109 | 9/13/22 | 21 | 12 | 5 | 15 | 38/81 | 9/21 | 16 |
Avg | 0 | 12:58 | 50.6% | 18.2% | 88.5% | 6.8 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 46.9% | 42.9% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-HAR | 53 | 742:46 | 79/184 | 2/27 | 36/48 | 196 | 36/85/121 | 72 | 22 | 13 | 33 | 127/303 | 27/96 | 94 |
Avg | 0 | 14:01 | 42.9% | 7.4% | 75.0% | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 41.9% | 28.1% | |
TOTALS | 53 | 742:46 | 79/184 | 2/27 | 36/48 | 196 | 36/85/121 | 72 | 22 | 13 | 33 | 127/303 | 27/96 | 94 |
Avg | 0 | 14:01 | 42.9% | 7.4% | 75.0% | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 41.9% | 28.1% | |
|