|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #6 out of 55
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #290, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #75 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 1087 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-NOR | 29 | 731:42 | 152/345 | 24/89 | 69/88 | 397 | 31/76/107 | 102 | 23 | 18 | 35 | 150/330 | 25/78 | 50 |
| Avg | | 25:14 | 44.1% | 27.0% | 78.4% | 13.7 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 45.5% | 32.1% | |
| 43-NOR | 53 | 1504:48 | 164/367 | 22/80 | 47/70 | 397 | 58/120/178 | 334 | 45 | 38 | 46 | 270/669 | 57/173 | 128 |
| Avg | 53 | 28:24 | 44.7% | 27.5% | 67.1% | 7.5 | 3.4 | 6.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 40.4% | 32.9% | |
| 42-NOR | 48 | 1138:35 | 77/187 | 11/40 | 42/53 | 207 | 38/96/134 | 236 | 36 | 22 | 23 | 205/497 | 52/143 | 88 |
| Avg | 31 | 23:43 | 41.2% | 27.5% | 79.2% | 4.3 | 2.8 | 4.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 41.2% | 36.4% | |
| 41-NOR | 53 | 1243:20 | 75/187 | 16/53 | 50/67 | 216 | 44/96/140 | 268 | 46 | 21 | 35 | 219/503 | 38/107 | 115 |
| Avg | 22 | 23:28 | 40.1% | 30.2% | 74.6% | 4.1 | 2.6 | 5.1 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 43.5% | 35.5% | |
| TOTALS | 183 | 4618:25 | 468/1086 | 73/262 | 208/278 | 1217 | 171/388/559 | 940 | 150 | 99 | 139 | 844/1999 | 172/501 | 381 |
| Avg | 106 | 25:14 | 43.1% | 27.9% | 74.8% | 6.7 | 3.1 | 5.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 42.2% | 34.3% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-NOR | 6 | 177:14 | 13/26 | 1/6 | 1/2 | 28 | 4/15/19 | 40 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 29/78 | 12/44 | 12 |
| Avg | 6 | 29:32 | 50.0% | 16.7% | 50.0% | 4.7 | 3.2 | 6.7 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 37.2% | 27.3% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 177:14 | 13/26 | 1/6 | 1/2 | 28 | 4/15/19 | 40 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 29/78 | 12/44 | 12 |
| Avg | 6 | 29:32 | 50.0% | 16.7% | 50.0% | 4.7 | 3.2 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 37.2% | 27.3% | |
|