
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #41 out of 76 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #654, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #647 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
44-TAM | 39 | 424:07 | 78/162 | 1/10 | 35/45 | 192 | 36/69/105 | 13 | 11 | 23 | 31 | 76/148 | 8/25 | 37 |
Avg | | 10:52 | 48.1% | 10.0% | 77.8% | 4.9 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 51.4% | 32.0% | |
43-TAM | 13 | 168:06 | 19/40 | 0/1 | 7/10 | 45 | 15/32/47 | 5 | 2 | 16 | 13 | 37/89 | 9/30 | 15 |
Avg | 0 | 12:56 | 47.5% | 0.0% | 70.0% | 3.5 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 41.6% | 30.0% | |
42-SOD | 36 | 485:22 | 25/75 | 1/4 | 23/31 | 74 | 46/102/148 | 27 | 13 | 21 | 18 | 61/149 | 11/34 | 42 |
Avg | 0 | 13:29 | 33.3% | 25.0% | 74.2% | 2.1 | 4.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 40.9% | 32.4% | |
TOTALS | 88 | 1077:35 | 122/277 | 2/15 | 65/86 | 311 | 97/203/300 | 45 | 26 | 60 | 62 | 174/386 | 28/89 | 94 |
Avg | 0 | 12:15 | 44.0% | 13.3% | 75.6% | 3.5 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 45.1% | 31.5% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
43-TAM | 7 | 74:02 | 9/22 | 0/1 | 1/2 | 19 | 8/14/22 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1/7 | 0/3 | 0 |
Avg | 0 | 10:35 | 40.9% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 2.7 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 14.3% | 0.0% | |
TOTALS | 7 | 74:02 | 9/22 | 0/1 | 1/2 | 19 | 8/14/22 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1/7 | 0/3 | 0 |
Avg | 0 | 10:35 | 40.9% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 2.7 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 14.3% | 0.0% | |
|