|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #16 out of 79
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #334, his statistical rank is #195.
Therefore we believe a salary of 690 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-TAM | 53 | 1987:04 | 253/676 | 81/265 | 61/93 | 648 | 232/459/691 | 98 | 67 | 102 | 125 | 250/592 | 29/120 | 142 |
| Avg | | 37:30 | 37.4% | 30.6% | 65.6% | 12.2 | 13.0 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 42.2% | 24.2% | |
| TOTALS | 53 | 1987:04 | 253/676 | 81/265 | 61/93 | 648 | 232/459/691 | 98 | 67 | 102 | 125 | 250/592 | 29/120 | 142 |
| Avg | 0 | 37:30 | 37.4% | 30.6% | 65.6% | 12.2 | 13.0 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 42.2% | 24.2% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-TAM | 5 | 187:25 | 17/48 | 7/23 | 2/2 | 43 | 19/39/58 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 17/34 | 6/14 | 7 |
| Avg | | 37:29 | 35.4% | 30.4% | 100.0% | 8.6 | 11.6 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 187:25 | 17/48 | 7/23 | 2/2 | 43 | 19/39/58 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 17/34 | 6/14 | 7 |
| Avg | 0 | 37:29 | 35.4% | 30.4% | 100.0% | 8.6 | 11.6 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 42-TAM | 53 | 1741:50 | 187/492 | 48/175 | 66/91 | 488 | 184/435/619 | 64 | 51 | 72 | 109 | 212/493 | 29/85 | 132 |
| Avg | 53 | 32:52 | 38.0% | 27.4% | 72.5% | 9.2 | 11.7 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 43.0% | 34.1% | |
| TOTALS | 53 | 1741:50 | 187/492 | 48/175 | 66/91 | 488 | 184/435/619 | 64 | 51 | 72 | 109 | 212/493 | 29/85 | 132 |
| Avg | 53 | 32:52 | 38.0% | 27.4% | 72.5% | 9.2 | 11.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 43.0% | 34.1% | |
|